23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

45<br />

Chapter 2<br />

previously reported cases (n = 12). Reaction time (Congruency x Group) and <strong>the</strong><br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> error types (Error Type x Group) were compared separately using a 2 x<br />

2 ANOVA (Figure 2.2a, 2.2b – for comparison non-synaes<strong>the</strong>tic control data, n = 20,<br />

is also shown, but not included in analysis). One participant from <strong>the</strong> self referral<br />

group was withdrawn from analysis <strong>of</strong> reaction times due to an insufficient number <strong>of</strong><br />

correct responses (< 25% correct responses in any one condition).<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> reaction time data revealed a significant main effect <strong>of</strong><br />

congruency, with subjects performing faster overall on trials which were congruent<br />

with <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> compared to incongruent trials [F(1, 18) = 13.98, p = < .01].<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> error type data revealed a significant main effect <strong>of</strong> error type, which was<br />

due to a higher proportion <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> errors being produced relative to o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

error types [F(1, 19) = 11.18, p = < .01]. No significant interaction or main effect <strong>of</strong><br />

group was found for reaction time (Group: [F(1, 18) = .048, p = .829]; Group x Cong:<br />

[F(1. 18) = .095, p = .761]) or error type analysis (Group: [ F(1, 19) = 2.77, p = .113];<br />

Group x Cong: [F(1. 19) = 2.75, p = .114]). This indicates that <strong>the</strong> prevalence and<br />

self-referred mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>te group come from <strong>the</strong> same population with<br />

regard to congruency effects. Therefore, both prevalence and self-referred cases are<br />

combined to consider additional cognitive characteristics <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong><br />

<strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong>.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> cases, <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> spatial congruity are found for bodies<br />

but not objects and this corresponds well with <strong>the</strong>ir phenomenological reports. There<br />

are, however, a minority <strong>of</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes who do report tactile experiences when<br />

watching objects being <strong>touch</strong>ed (4 out <strong>of</strong> 21). For some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se synaes<strong>the</strong>tes, this<br />

experience is reported in <strong>the</strong> finger tip that is <strong>touch</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> objects, but for o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

synaes<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>touch</strong> is mapped onto particular body locations which are thought to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!