23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

137<br />

Chapter 7<br />

2000; Pitcher et al., 2008) to suggest that activity in rSI is central to <strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong><br />

emotion across different modalities. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, in recent years a number <strong>of</strong> functional<br />

brain imaging studies have documented <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> premotor cortex activity in <strong>the</strong><br />

mirroring <strong>of</strong> actions and emotions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs (Dapretto et al., 2006; Hennenlotter et al.,<br />

2005; Leslie, Johnsen-Frey, and Grafton, 2004; Montgomery and Haxby, 2008; van<br />

der Gaag, Minderaa, and Keysers, 2007; Warren et al., 2006). Using stimuli adapted<br />

from one such study (Warren et al., 2006), <strong>the</strong> findings show that neural activity in<br />

rPM plays a central <strong>role</strong> in non-verbal auditory emotion discrimination in healthy<br />

adults. These findings are consistent with simulation-based accounts <strong>of</strong> emotion<br />

processing, which contend that perceived emotions are mapped onto an individual’s<br />

own somatosensory and motor representations to facilitate emotion recognition<br />

(Adolphs, 2002; Adolphs, 2003; Damasio, 1990; Gallese, Keysers, and Rizzolatti,<br />

2004; Goldman and Sripada, 2005; Keysers and Gazzola, 2006).<br />

The task specific nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> findings fur<strong>the</strong>r supports <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> rSI and<br />

rPM activity as a substrate for a mechanism that facilitates emotion processing.<br />

Under equivalent conditions to experiment 1, cTBS targeted at rSI and rPM did not<br />

impair participants’ ability to discriminate ano<strong>the</strong>r’s identity, indicating that <strong>the</strong><br />

changes in reaction time are not simply due to a general reduction in reaction times<br />

following cTBS stimulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se regions or more widespread suppression <strong>of</strong><br />

neural activity. In contrast to a disruption in emotion discrimination abilities, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was a trend for facilitation when participants were asked to discriminate <strong>the</strong> identity<br />

<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. This facilitation is non-specific because it is seen over all sites stimulated in<br />

<strong>the</strong> identity task, and does not differ significantly between sites. The nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

effect may reflect practice in <strong>the</strong> post-cTBS blocks or intersensory facilitation<br />

following cTBS (Marzi et al., 1998; Walsh and Pascual-Leone, 2003).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!