Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
137<br />
Chapter 7<br />
2000; Pitcher et al., 2008) to suggest that activity in rSI is central to <strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong><br />
emotion across different modalities. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, in recent years a number <strong>of</strong> functional<br />
brain imaging studies have documented <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> premotor cortex activity in <strong>the</strong><br />
mirroring <strong>of</strong> actions and emotions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs (Dapretto et al., 2006; Hennenlotter et al.,<br />
2005; Leslie, Johnsen-Frey, and Grafton, 2004; Montgomery and Haxby, 2008; van<br />
der Gaag, Minderaa, and Keysers, 2007; Warren et al., 2006). Using stimuli adapted<br />
from one such study (Warren et al., 2006), <strong>the</strong> findings show that neural activity in<br />
rPM plays a central <strong>role</strong> in non-verbal auditory emotion discrimination in healthy<br />
adults. These findings are consistent with simulation-based accounts <strong>of</strong> emotion<br />
processing, which contend that perceived emotions are mapped onto an individual’s<br />
own somatosensory and motor representations to facilitate emotion recognition<br />
(Adolphs, 2002; Adolphs, 2003; Damasio, 1990; Gallese, Keysers, and Rizzolatti,<br />
2004; Goldman and Sripada, 2005; Keysers and Gazzola, 2006).<br />
The task specific nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> findings fur<strong>the</strong>r supports <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> rSI and<br />
rPM activity as a substrate for a mechanism that facilitates emotion processing.<br />
Under equivalent conditions to experiment 1, cTBS targeted at rSI and rPM did not<br />
impair participants’ ability to discriminate ano<strong>the</strong>r’s identity, indicating that <strong>the</strong><br />
changes in reaction time are not simply due to a general reduction in reaction times<br />
following cTBS stimulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se regions or more widespread suppression <strong>of</strong><br />
neural activity. In contrast to a disruption in emotion discrimination abilities, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
was a trend for facilitation when participants were asked to discriminate <strong>the</strong> identity<br />
<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. This facilitation is non-specific because it is seen over all sites stimulated in<br />
<strong>the</strong> identity task, and does not differ significantly between sites. The nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
effect may reflect practice in <strong>the</strong> post-cTBS blocks or intersensory facilitation<br />
following cTBS (Marzi et al., 1998; Walsh and Pascual-Leone, 2003).