23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88<br />

EQ Score<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

<strong>Mirror</strong>-Touch Synaes<strong>the</strong>tes<br />

Controls<br />

Cognitive Empathy Emotional Reactivity Social Skills<br />

*<br />

Chapter 4<br />

Figure 4.2 In experiment 2, mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes showed significantly higher<br />

scores than controls on <strong>the</strong> emotional reactivity component, but not o<strong>the</strong>r components,<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Empathy Quotient (mean ± s.e.m). * = p < .05.<br />

In addition, on <strong>the</strong> IRI mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes showed significantly<br />

elevated scores on <strong>the</strong> fantasizing subscale [t(30) = 2.35, p = < .05], but not on <strong>the</strong><br />

alternative subscales (Figure 4.3). Of note, is <strong>the</strong> comparable performance <strong>of</strong><br />

synaes<strong>the</strong>tes and controls on <strong>the</strong> perspective taking subscale and higher scores <strong>of</strong><br />

controls relative to synaes<strong>the</strong>tes on <strong>the</strong> personal distress subscale, which indicates that<br />

differences were not simply due to a tendency for synaes<strong>the</strong>tes to provided higher<br />

self-reported values overall (also see Figure 4.4).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!