Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
143<br />
Chapter 8<br />
necessary for all or only some distinct facial expressions is a matter <strong>of</strong> debate. To<br />
date only two transcranial magnetic stimulation studies have addressed <strong>the</strong> necessity<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> right somatosensory cortex in healthy adults. In one study, two emotional<br />
expressions (fear and happiness) and single pulse TMS over right somatosensory<br />
cortex were used to investigate <strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> this brain region for emotion<br />
recognition in healthy adults. These authors observed an expression-selective TMS-<br />
related interference following stimulation <strong>of</strong> right somatosensory cortex during <strong>the</strong><br />
recognition <strong>of</strong> fearful, but not happy expressions (Pourtois et al., 2004). In contrast, a<br />
more recent repetitive TMS study (Pitcher et al., 2008), using six emotional<br />
expressions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise), found an<br />
expression-general impairment following stimulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> right somatosensory<br />
cortex. Fur<strong>the</strong>r study is needed to clarify this discrepancy.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, in both previous TMS studies a same-different matching task<br />
was used to assess participants’ expression recognition abilities. The nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
tasks requires some degree <strong>of</strong> working memory in which <strong>the</strong> participant must not only<br />
recognize a sample expression but store <strong>the</strong> information in memory to match it to a<br />
sequential expression. Therefore it is difficult to disentangle whe<strong>the</strong>r TMS<br />
impairment results from a disruption <strong>of</strong> fronto-parietal working memory networks (cf.<br />
Harris, Harris, and Diamond, 2001; Mottaghy, Gangitano, Sparing, Krause, and<br />
Pascual-Leone, 2002; Oliveri et al., 2001) or sensorimotor simulation mechanisms per<br />
se 4 .<br />
To address this, this study sought to establish: i) whe<strong>the</strong>r neural activity in <strong>the</strong><br />
right primary somatosensory cortex (rSI) and right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) is<br />
central to recognizing <strong>the</strong> facial expressions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs and ii) whe<strong>the</strong>r, at <strong>the</strong> cortical<br />
4 Note that this is controlled for in Chapter 7 because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> task-specific dissociation observed.