23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

133<br />

Chapter 7<br />

Figure 7.2 Summary <strong>of</strong> TBS sites stimulated, rSI (a), rPM (b). Locations <strong>of</strong> TMS<br />

were determined using <strong>the</strong> Brainsight coregistration system. The co-ordinates for rSI<br />

(27, -27, 69) were taken from a study on <strong>the</strong> tactile mirror-system (Blakemore et al.,<br />

2005), <strong>the</strong> co-ordinates for rPM (54 -2 44) were taken from a study on <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

sensorimotor resources in auditory emotion recognition (Warren et al., 2006). cTBS<br />

parameters were used to stimulate each site. To ensure that any differences observed<br />

were not due to non-specific effects <strong>of</strong> cTBS, <strong>the</strong> vertex was stimulated as a TMS<br />

control site.<br />

7.3 Results<br />

Reaction times were trimmed prior to analysis (± 3 standard deviations and all<br />

errors removed) and were corrected for accuracy (mean RT divided by percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

correct).<br />

The <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> r SI and rPM in recognizing emotions and identity from auditory cues<br />

Baseline performance did not differ significantly across sites in ei<strong>the</strong>r task<br />

(Emotion task group: F(2,18) = 1.64, n.sig; Identity task group: F(2,18) = .815, n.sig).<br />

To assess <strong>the</strong> effects across tasks and across sites, <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> post

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!