23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

157<br />

Chapter 9<br />

<strong>the</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>te; anatomical subtype). The first reported case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

condition was provided in a single case fMRI study, which linked <strong>the</strong> condition to<br />

heightened neural activity in a network <strong>of</strong> brain regions which are also activated in<br />

non-synaes<strong>the</strong>tic control subjects when observing <strong>touch</strong> to o<strong>the</strong>rs (<strong>the</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong><br />

system, comprised <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, premotor<br />

cortex, intraparietal sulcus and superior temporal sulcus; Blakemore et al., 2005).<br />

Chapter 2 examined <strong>the</strong> prevalence and characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> condition.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first experiment reported in chapter 2 <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong><br />

<strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> was assessed by screening a large population <strong>of</strong> undergraduate students<br />

for <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> and determining <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> reported<br />

cases with a synaes<strong>the</strong>tic stroop task (Banissy and Ward, 2007). In <strong>the</strong> task,<br />

participants were asked to indicate <strong>the</strong> site <strong>of</strong> <strong>touch</strong> on <strong>the</strong>ir own body while<br />

observing <strong>touch</strong> to ano<strong>the</strong>r person. Participants were asked to report <strong>the</strong> site <strong>of</strong><br />

veridical <strong>touch</strong> and ignore any synaes<strong>the</strong>tic tactile experience induced. For<br />

synaes<strong>the</strong>tes, but not for controls, veridical <strong>touch</strong> could be in <strong>the</strong> same (congruent) or<br />

different (incongruent) location to observed / synaes<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>touch</strong> (congruency was<br />

determined according to each synaes<strong>the</strong>te’s self reports). Synaes<strong>the</strong>tes performed<br />

slower in <strong>the</strong> incongruent condition and produced more errors linked to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong>. Nine mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes (from 567 participants screened) were<br />

confirmed, which provides an estimated prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> 1.6%. This places mirror-<br />

<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most common variants <strong>of</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong>, alongside<br />

grapheme-colour <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> (estimated prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> 2%; Simner et al., 2006)<br />

and day-colour <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> (estimated prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> 2.8%; Simner et al., 2006).<br />

By combining cases <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> from <strong>the</strong> prevalence study<br />

with cases <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> from self-referrals, <strong>the</strong> findings from chapter

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!