23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156<br />

Chapter 9<br />

transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Specifically <strong>the</strong> following questions were<br />

addressed:<br />

1. What is <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> and what<br />

characteristics identify <strong>the</strong> condition (Chapter 2)?<br />

2. What neurocognitive mechanisms give rise to mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong><br />

(Chapter 2)?<br />

3. Does <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> have implications for perceptual<br />

processing (Chapter 3)?<br />

4. What are <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> heightened sensorimotor simulation in mirror-<br />

<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> for social cognition (Chapters 4 and 5)?<br />

5. What are <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> suppressing sensorimotor resources on<br />

expression recognition abilities in healthy adults (Chapters 7 and 8)?<br />

9.2 What is <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> and what<br />

characteristics underpin <strong>the</strong> condition?<br />

As noted previously, in mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> individuals experience<br />

tactile sensations on <strong>the</strong>ir own body simply when observing <strong>touch</strong> to ano<strong>the</strong>r person<br />

(Banissy and Ward, 2007; Banissy, Cohen Kadosh, Maus, Walsh, and Ward, 2009;<br />

Blakemore et al., 2005). The mapping between synaes<strong>the</strong>tic experience (i.e. location<br />

on <strong>the</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>te’s body) and observed-<strong>touch</strong> (i.e. <strong>the</strong> location where <strong>touch</strong> is<br />

perceived on ano<strong>the</strong>r person’s body) has been shown to vary between mirror-<strong>touch</strong><br />

synaes<strong>the</strong>tes (Banissy and Ward, 2007), with some synaes<strong>the</strong>tes reporting<br />

synaes<strong>the</strong>tic experiences as if looking in a mirror (e.g. observed-<strong>touch</strong> to <strong>the</strong> left face<br />

elicits a synaes<strong>the</strong>tic experience on <strong>the</strong> left cheek <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>te;<br />

specular subtype) and o<strong>the</strong>rs as if <strong>the</strong>y share <strong>the</strong> same anatomical body space (e.g.<br />

observed-<strong>touch</strong> to <strong>the</strong> left face elicits a synaes<strong>the</strong>tic experience on <strong>the</strong> left cheek <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!