Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
156<br />
Chapter 9<br />
transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Specifically <strong>the</strong> following questions were<br />
addressed:<br />
1. What is <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> and what<br />
characteristics identify <strong>the</strong> condition (Chapter 2)?<br />
2. What neurocognitive mechanisms give rise to mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong><br />
(Chapter 2)?<br />
3. Does <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> have implications for perceptual<br />
processing (Chapter 3)?<br />
4. What are <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> heightened sensorimotor simulation in mirror-<br />
<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> for social cognition (Chapters 4 and 5)?<br />
5. What are <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> suppressing sensorimotor resources on<br />
expression recognition abilities in healthy adults (Chapters 7 and 8)?<br />
9.2 What is <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> and what<br />
characteristics underpin <strong>the</strong> condition?<br />
As noted previously, in mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong> individuals experience<br />
tactile sensations on <strong>the</strong>ir own body simply when observing <strong>touch</strong> to ano<strong>the</strong>r person<br />
(Banissy and Ward, 2007; Banissy, Cohen Kadosh, Maus, Walsh, and Ward, 2009;<br />
Blakemore et al., 2005). The mapping between synaes<strong>the</strong>tic experience (i.e. location<br />
on <strong>the</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>te’s body) and observed-<strong>touch</strong> (i.e. <strong>the</strong> location where <strong>touch</strong> is<br />
perceived on ano<strong>the</strong>r person’s body) has been shown to vary between mirror-<strong>touch</strong><br />
synaes<strong>the</strong>tes (Banissy and Ward, 2007), with some synaes<strong>the</strong>tes reporting<br />
synaes<strong>the</strong>tic experiences as if looking in a mirror (e.g. observed-<strong>touch</strong> to <strong>the</strong> left face<br />
elicits a synaes<strong>the</strong>tic experience on <strong>the</strong> left cheek <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>te;<br />
specular subtype) and o<strong>the</strong>rs as if <strong>the</strong>y share <strong>the</strong> same anatomical body space (e.g.<br />
observed-<strong>touch</strong> to <strong>the</strong> left face elicits a synaes<strong>the</strong>tic experience on <strong>the</strong> left cheek <strong>of</strong>