23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152<br />

Chapter 8<br />

processed by a single “expression system” and that expression-general and<br />

expression-specific representations may interact at varying levels <strong>of</strong> processing. The<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> impairment on disgust recognition found here may reflect <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong><br />

neural noise introduced in rSI by TMS is better compensated for by emotions which<br />

have more alternative mechanisms / expression-specific representations elsewhere in<br />

<strong>the</strong> brain. For example, <strong>the</strong>re is a good degree <strong>of</strong> evidence from functional brain<br />

imaging (Phillips et al., 1997, 1998; Sprengelmeyer, Rausch, Eysel, and Przuntek,<br />

1998), intracerebral recording (Krolak-Salmon et al., 2003), and neuropsychological<br />

studies (Calder et al., 2000; Kipps, Duggins, McCusker, and Calder, 2007) which<br />

indicate that <strong>the</strong> anteroventral insula acts as an expression-specific mechanism for<br />

disgust recognition. The anteroventral section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> insula is connected to number <strong>of</strong><br />

regions which are thought to be involved in emotion processing across modalities<br />

(including <strong>the</strong> primary somatosensory cortex, basal ganglia, amygdala, orbit<strong>of</strong>rontal<br />

cortex and superior temporal cortex; Augustine, 1996; Flynn, Benson, and Ardila,<br />

1999; Mesulam and Mufson, 1982) and has been suggested to act as a point <strong>of</strong><br />

convergence for sources involved in <strong>the</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> disgust recognition to varying<br />

degrees (Kipps et al., 2007). It is feasible that suppressing rSI with cTBS reduces<br />

one, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiple sources, <strong>of</strong> information which contributes to disgust processing in<br />

this section <strong>of</strong> insula, and <strong>the</strong>refore does not result in impairment. It is also possible<br />

that with alternative paradigms (e.g. same-different expression matching paradigms as<br />

opposed to a forced-choice paradigm which could bias responses <strong>of</strong> disgust and<br />

<strong>the</strong>reby facilitate performance) and stimuli (e.g. dynamic stimuli as opposed to static),<br />

stimulation to rSI may lead to a disruption <strong>of</strong> participants’ abilities to recognise<br />

disgusted facial expressions (c.f. Chapter 7; Pitcher et al., 2008).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!