23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82<br />

Chapter 4<br />

months (Baron-Cohen et al., 2003). The scale is comprised <strong>of</strong> 40 test items and 20<br />

filler items. All items are a series <strong>of</strong> statements (e.g. ‘I can tune into how someone<br />

feels rapidly and intuitively) and responses are given on a 4 point scale ranging from<br />

‘strongly agree’ to ‘strongly disagree’. Responses score 1 or 2 points for an empathic<br />

response and 0 points for all o<strong>the</strong>r responses. Principal component analysis has<br />

indicated that <strong>the</strong> EQ is comprised <strong>of</strong> three main factors (i) cognitive empathy, (ii)<br />

emotional reactivity and (iii) social skills (Lawrence et al., 2004; Muncer and Ling,<br />

2006). Confirmatory factor analysis has indicated that <strong>the</strong> EQ may be better<br />

conceived as comprising <strong>of</strong> this three factor structure ra<strong>the</strong>r than a 40 item unifactorial<br />

scale (Lawrence et al., 2004; Muncer and Ling, 2006).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The empathic ability <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes was compared with non-<br />

synaes<strong>the</strong>tic control participants and controls that report o<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong><br />

but do not report mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong>. Results from non-synaes<strong>the</strong>tic controls<br />

and synaes<strong>the</strong>tes lacking mirror <strong>touch</strong> did not differ and were <strong>the</strong>refore combined.<br />

Empathy scores for each component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EQ are summarised in Figure 4.1. <strong>Mirror</strong>-<br />

<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes showed significantly higher scores on <strong>the</strong> emotional reactivity<br />

subscale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EQ relative to controls [t(53) = 2.15, p = < .05]. This subscale is<br />

thought to reflect affective components <strong>of</strong> empathy, and instinctive empathic<br />

responses to o<strong>the</strong>rs (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004; Lawrence et al., 2004).<br />

There was also a non-significant trend for mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes to outperform<br />

control subjects on <strong>the</strong> cognitive empathy (i.e. mentalizing / perspective taking)<br />

subscale [t(53) = 1.92, p = .061]. Scores on <strong>the</strong> social skills subscale did not approach<br />

significance [t(53) = 1.22, p = .227]. Therefore, mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes showed<br />

heightened empathy on some, but not all aspects <strong>of</strong> empathy. This supports <strong>the</strong> notion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!