Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
82<br />
Chapter 4<br />
months (Baron-Cohen et al., 2003). The scale is comprised <strong>of</strong> 40 test items and 20<br />
filler items. All items are a series <strong>of</strong> statements (e.g. ‘I can tune into how someone<br />
feels rapidly and intuitively) and responses are given on a 4 point scale ranging from<br />
‘strongly agree’ to ‘strongly disagree’. Responses score 1 or 2 points for an empathic<br />
response and 0 points for all o<strong>the</strong>r responses. Principal component analysis has<br />
indicated that <strong>the</strong> EQ is comprised <strong>of</strong> three main factors (i) cognitive empathy, (ii)<br />
emotional reactivity and (iii) social skills (Lawrence et al., 2004; Muncer and Ling,<br />
2006). Confirmatory factor analysis has indicated that <strong>the</strong> EQ may be better<br />
conceived as comprising <strong>of</strong> this three factor structure ra<strong>the</strong>r than a 40 item unifactorial<br />
scale (Lawrence et al., 2004; Muncer and Ling, 2006).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
The empathic ability <strong>of</strong> mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes was compared with non-<br />
synaes<strong>the</strong>tic control participants and controls that report o<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong><br />
but do not report mirror-<strong>touch</strong> <strong>synaes<strong>the</strong>sia</strong>. Results from non-synaes<strong>the</strong>tic controls<br />
and synaes<strong>the</strong>tes lacking mirror <strong>touch</strong> did not differ and were <strong>the</strong>refore combined.<br />
Empathy scores for each component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EQ are summarised in Figure 4.1. <strong>Mirror</strong>-<br />
<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes showed significantly higher scores on <strong>the</strong> emotional reactivity<br />
subscale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EQ relative to controls [t(53) = 2.15, p = < .05]. This subscale is<br />
thought to reflect affective components <strong>of</strong> empathy, and instinctive empathic<br />
responses to o<strong>the</strong>rs (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004; Lawrence et al., 2004).<br />
There was also a non-significant trend for mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes to outperform<br />
control subjects on <strong>the</strong> cognitive empathy (i.e. mentalizing / perspective taking)<br />
subscale [t(53) = 1.92, p = .061]. Scores on <strong>the</strong> social skills subscale did not approach<br />
significance [t(53) = 1.22, p = .227]. Therefore, mirror-<strong>touch</strong> synaes<strong>the</strong>tes showed<br />
heightened empathy on some, but not all aspects <strong>of</strong> empathy. This supports <strong>the</strong> notion