01.03.2013 Views

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />

viewpoints and then given a Visual Impact Rating (VIR) of: low, moderate,<br />

moderately high, or high.<br />

No Build Alternative<br />

The no build alternative would have no effect on visual resources within the<br />

project area.<br />

Preferred Alternative<br />

There are general visual impacts that would affect the entire project area, not only<br />

views from specific viewpoints. The visual short term impacts during construction<br />

would affect most viewpoints. Grading would affect existing topography,<br />

vegetation, and vistas and large construction vehicles would be visible from<br />

adjacent land. Barren slopes and the project in various stages of development<br />

would be visible intermittently throughout project construction.<br />

Offsite structures visible from the proposed roadway that would impact visual<br />

quality are the Arizona Portland Cement plant, commercial land uses along the<br />

frontage roads, and the TEP transmission line. These visual elements, which would<br />

be considered less desirable, would become more noticeable when viewed from<br />

the proposed elevated roadway section; however, the proposed elevated roadways<br />

would enhance the roadway users’ view of the Tucson, Santa Catalina, and<br />

Tortolita Mountains, which would be desirable views.<br />

View from <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road<br />

The preferred alternative would affect the existing open space views to the east<br />

from Continental Ranch. The proposed improvements would blend with existing<br />

land uses and traffic near the interstate; however, the alternative would contrast<br />

with the open space views and landscapes in the floodplain. In addition, residents<br />

on the south side of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road would have views blocked by a proposed<br />

17-foot tall noise wall. Lighting at the signalized intersections and light and glare<br />

from vehicle headlights would be visible also. In this area, there would be a<br />

moderate adverse change to the existing visual resource and a moderate viewer<br />

response; therefore, views from <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road would be moderately impacted.<br />

View from the High Flow Channel of the Santa Cruz River<br />

The preferred alternative would allow greater access to floodplain views.<br />

Background views to the west (Tucson Mountains) would be enhanced, because of<br />

the elevated roadway; however, views of the developed areas would be affected<br />

negatively by the proposed 17-foot tall noise walls on the south side of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong><br />

Road. Depending on the vantage point, background views to the east may be<br />

obstructed by the interchange/bridges or enhanced by the elevated roadway. In this<br />

area, there would be a moderate adverse change to the existing visual resource and<br />

a moderate viewer response; therefore, views from the high flow channel of the<br />

Santa Cruz River would be moderately impacted.<br />

Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />

4-43<br />

Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />

TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!