01.03.2013 Views

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />

Conclusion<br />

Construction of the preferred alternative would require that one or more of the 138<br />

kv TEP transmission line towers be relocated or raised. Close coordination with<br />

TEP would minimize interruptions and inconvenience to customers. While setting<br />

the proposed <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road bridge deck over the UPRR, temporary impacts to<br />

train traffic may occur; however, UPRR would review the plans and would be<br />

involved in the sequencing of construction to ensure that temporary disruptions to<br />

train traffic would be minimized. Some private wells and septic tanks may be<br />

affected by the proposed improvements. The preferred alternative would modify<br />

the CMID canal, but the proposed improvements would not interfere with the<br />

supply of irrigation water during critical periods. Utility coordination would be<br />

maintained throughout the course of the project and schedules for any utility<br />

adjustments would be coordinated closely to minimize interruptions and<br />

inconvenience to utility users. If asbestos-containing water lines are moved or<br />

replaced during the roadway construction, precautions would be implemented to<br />

ensure that the asbestos-containing material would be handled safely.<br />

Material Sources and Waste Materials<br />

Quantity of Borrow<br />

The preferred alternative would construct <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road, the Santa Cruz River<br />

bridges, <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road bridge over I-<strong>10</strong> and the UPRR on elevated<br />

embankments. Although the preferred alternative would generate excavation<br />

material from the widening of the low flow channel of the Santa Cruz River, the<br />

project would still require approximately 640,000 cubic yards of borrow material.<br />

Availability<br />

Sand and gravel mining operations operate within the study area. An existing sand<br />

and gravel mining operation (I-<strong>10</strong> Avra Valley Mining and Development) is<br />

located on the west side of the Santa Cruz River south of Avra Valley Road, which<br />

is north of the project area. Another active sand and gravel mining operation<br />

(Rinker Materials) is located in the southern project area immediately south of the<br />

south access road.<br />

Status of Clearance of Sites<br />

Any material sources required for this project outside of the project area would be<br />

examined for environmental effects, by the contractor, prior to use, through a<br />

separate environmental analysis in accordance with Arizona Department of<br />

Transportation’s Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction,<br />

Section <strong>10</strong>01 Material Sources (2000 Edition) (Stored Specification <strong>10</strong>01.2<br />

General), unless the facility has received prior clearance from the EEG of ADOT.<br />

According to Rinker Materials, their materials pit has received environmental<br />

clearance to provide materials to ADOT; therefore, materials from this site could<br />

Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />

4-<strong>10</strong>0<br />

Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />

TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!