01.03.2013 Views

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />

studies were conducted at two of those before residential developments were<br />

constructed. Another appears to have been destroyed by erosion before it was<br />

recorded, and a sand and gravel quarry operation destroyed another.<br />

Numerous features were recorded at the seven artifact scatters with features. These<br />

included, rock shelters, bedrock mortars, check dams, rock piles, a canal, hearths,<br />

and roasting pits. One site dated to the Archaic era, and the others were Hohokam.<br />

Two sites were characterized as artifact scatters without features and were<br />

destroyed after they were recorded and another could not be found when a<br />

subsequent survey tried to relocate the site. Eight of the 15 historic-era sites were<br />

habitations or sites with remnants of other types of buildings. Three of these were<br />

homesteads.<br />

Four of the historic sites were related to transportation. These included the Tucson-<br />

Casa Grande Highway (State Route (SR) 84), and its predecessor, the Red Rock<br />

Road. Another was the current UPRR, which was constructed in 1880. The fourth<br />

is the Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail, which is one of only 19<br />

National Historic Trails designated by Congress. The trail corridor was identified<br />

on the basis of written documents, and no physical evidence of the de Anza<br />

expedition have been found in the record search area.<br />

Of the three sites with both prehistoric and historic components, data recovery was<br />

conducted at one site before it was destroyed by a residential development.<br />

Another had remnants of a historic house with a scatter of prehistoric artifacts. The<br />

third site was a scatter of both prehistoric and historic artifacts.<br />

Archeological Sites – Field Survey<br />

Twelve of the previously recorded archaeological and historical resources<br />

identified by the records search were mapped within the alternatives area, and each<br />

of these was re-evaluated during the field survey. The current surveys located three<br />

additional cultural sites, one historic-age building, and two historic age wells that<br />

were previously unrecorded within the project area. Each of these resources are<br />

described below. The ASM site number follows the site name.<br />

Tucson-Casa Grande Highway (SR 84) AZ AA:2:118(ASM)<br />

Different segments of SR 84 have been recorded and designated with various<br />

numbers in the Arizona State Museum survey system. The segment of the highway<br />

within the alternatives analysis area was converted to the northwest-bound<br />

frontage road of I-<strong>10</strong> when I-<strong>10</strong> was constructed. The historic highway remains in<br />

use as a frontage road and is well maintained. During the field surveys for this<br />

project, two concrete box culverts were noted along the highway within the<br />

alternatives analysis area. Each has a survey benchmark medallion dated 1930.<br />

Stewart Brickyard Site AZ AA:12:51(ASM)<br />

The Stewart Brickyard site was recorded in 1955 and was described as a scatter of<br />

Hohokam pottery sherds that had been progressively destroyed by construction of<br />

the Southern Pacific Railroad, Casa Grande Highway (SR 84), and the Southern<br />

Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />

4-68<br />

Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />

TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!