01.03.2013 Views

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />

Construction noise is intermittent and depends on the type of operation, location,<br />

and function of the equipment, and the equipment usage cycle. <strong>Traffic</strong> noise is<br />

more continuous after construction activities are completed.<br />

Permanent Impacts<br />

Predicted noise levels assuming completion of the preferred alternative may be<br />

found in the column labeled Modeled Future (2030) in the table in Appendix C. Of<br />

the 126 modeled receivers, 49 were predicted to experience noise levels that would<br />

require consideration of traffic noise abatement. The results of the modeling for<br />

the future condition are divided by area and discussed in the following sections.<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road (Receivers noted as NR# and RS#)<br />

As would be expected, adding a new segment of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road to connect to<br />

I-<strong>10</strong> increases traffic substantially through Continental Ranch and results in traffic<br />

moving through an area where no traffic exists currently. As a result of this<br />

increase in traffic and the new roadway, noise levels are predicted to increase<br />

along <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road. As shown in the table in Appendix C, the increase in<br />

traffic noise levels ranges from 6 dBA to 18 dBA. The areas of higher increases<br />

were those areas on the east side of Continental Ranch where no roadway exists<br />

currently (NR26-NR32A and RS27-RS30).<br />

Although STAMINA did not predict that traffic noise levels would approach or<br />

exceed the NAC (64 dBA or higher for the residences and other sensitive land uses<br />

in this area), substantial increases (15 dBA) in noise levels were predicted. These<br />

increases are predicted along the eastern border of Continental Ranch both north<br />

and south of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road.<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road TI area (Receivers noted as I<strong>10</strong>F#)<br />

STAMINA predicted increases in traffic noise in this area as well. However,<br />

because traffic noise levels and traffic volumes are already high in this area, the<br />

predicted increases were much lower than along <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road. In this area<br />

traffic noise level increases ranged from 4 dBA to 5 dBA; however, all modeled<br />

receivers in this area approached or exceeded the NAC (69 dBA or higher for<br />

commercial properties).<br />

Linda Vista Boulevard (Receivers noted as LVR#)<br />

Although no improvements to Linda Vista Boulevard are proposed throughout the<br />

majority of the study area, the provision of a <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road TI, would result in<br />

increased traffic along Linda Vista Boulevard. To fully explore traffic noise<br />

impacts, traffic noise levels were modeled as far east as Thornydale Road (nearly 4<br />

miles east of the <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road TI). As a result of the increase in traffic,<br />

STAMINA predicted increases in traffic noise levels ranging from 2 dBA to 14<br />

dBA. Because of this wide range in values, these areas are discussed individually<br />

below.<br />

Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />

4-52<br />

Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />

TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!