I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Affected Environment and Environmental Impacts October 2005 Impacts No Build Alternative Under the no build alternative, no affects to wildlife would occur. Preferred Alternative Proposed improvements to Twin Peaks Road, Linda Vista Boulevard, and El Camino de Mañana would impact vegetation that may provide wildlife habitat. Vegetation impacts would be limited to riparian vegetation along the Santa Cruz River and desertscrub vegetation in upland areas along Linda Vista Boulevard and El Camino de Mañana. The preferred alternative would not impact wildlife movement along the Santa Cruz River. The bottom of the proposed bridge structures over the Santa Cruz River would be approximately 20 feet above the low flow channel of the Santa Cruz River, which would allow adequate clearance for wildlife movement under Twin Peaks Road. New or larger diameter drainage structures under Linda Vista Boulevard, El Camino de Mañana, and I-10 could enhance wildlife movement under the roadways. Mitigation Prior to removal of vegetation during construction, the Town of Marana would develop a revegetation plan that would comply with the Arizona Native Plant Law (ANPL), and Native Plant Protection Ordinances (NPPO) of the Town of Marana and Pima County (see Threatened/Endangered Wildlife Species page 4-26). In addition, the revegetation plan would include Corps’ recommendations from the TRDN Feasibility Study (see Mitigation in the Threatened and Endangered Section below). As a result of the revegetation plan, the value of the vegetation in the disturbed area of the project area would be improved by construction of the preferred alternative. Conclusion Proposed improvements to Twin Peaks Road, Linda Vista Boulevard, and El Camino de Mañana would impact vegetation that may provide wildlife habitat; however, as a result of the revegetation plan, the value of the vegetation in the project area would be improved. The preferred alternative would not impact wildlife movement along the Santa Cruz River and may enhance wildlife movement under Linda Vista Boulevard, El Camino de Mañana, and I-10 in new or larger diameter drainage structures. Threatened/Endangered Wildlife Species Species For purposes of this assessment, federally listed wildlife species include endangered, threatened, proposed, or candidate species as defined in the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (Endangered Species Act Interstate 10 Traffic Interchange at Twin Peaks/Linda Vista 4-26 Project No.: NH-010-D (AIW) TRACS No.: 10 PM 236 H5838 01D
Affected Environment and Environmental Impacts October 2005 1988). The list of federal wildlife species used in this report was developed from the federally listed, proposed, and candidate wildlife species for Pima County from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Arizona Ecological Field Office website. The species list contains 16 endangered and threatened, 1 proposed endangered, and 2 candidate wildlife species (Table 4-3). It was determined that listed species or suitable habitat could be impacted by the Preferred Alternative; therefore, a Biological Evaluation (BE) was prepared. The findings of this BE, entitled Interstate 10 Traffic Interchange at Twin Peaks/Linda Vista Biological Evaluation, July 27, 2004 is summarized below. Of the 19 species described above, 13 were not evaluated further because the project area is either: 1) clearly outside of the known geographic or elevational range of the species, or, 2) does not contain habitat characteristics known to support the species. Of the six remaining species, one federally listed species, cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl (Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum), has been documented by Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) as occurring within two miles of the study area. Furthermore, the study area contains suitable habitat for five additional federally listed species: desert pupfish (Cyprinodon macularius), Gila chub (Gila intermedia), Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), and yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus). Each of these species is discussed below. Table 4-3. Special Status Wildlife Species Common Name Scientific Name Status Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum Endangered California Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis californicus Endangered Chiricahua Leopard Frog Rana chiricahuensis Threatened Desert Pupfish Cyprinodon macularius Endangered Gila Topminnow Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis Endangered Jaguar Panthera onca Endangered Lesser Long-nosed Bat Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae Endangered Loach Minnow Tiaroga cobitis Threatened Masked Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Endangered Mexican Gray Wolf Canis lupus baileyi Endangered Mexican Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis lucida Threatened Ocelot Leopardus pardalis Endangered Sonoran pronghorn Antilocapra americana sonoriensis Endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus Endangered Spikedace Meda fulgida Threatened Gila Chub Gila intermedia Proposed Endangered Sonoyta Mud Turtle Kinosternon sonoriense longifemorale Candidate Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus Candidate Interstate 10 Traffic Interchange at Twin Peaks/Linda Vista 4-27 Project No.: NH-010-D (AIW) TRACS No.: 10 PM 236 H5838 01D
Page 1:
Interstate 10 Traffic Interchange a
Page 4 and 5:
Draft Environmental Assessment Octo
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Mitigation Measures October 2005
Page 14 and 15:
Mitigation Measures October 2005 19
Page 16 and 17:
Mitigation Measures October 2005 St
Page 18 and 19:
Introduction October 2005 CHAPTER 1
Page 20 and 21:
AVRA VALLEY RD MARANA I-10 SCENIC D
Page 22 and 23:
Introduction October 2005 Cortaro R
Page 24 and 25:
Project Purpose and Need October 20
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35: Alternatives October 2005 CHAPTER 3
Page 36 and 37: Alternatives October 2005 Figure 3-
Page 38 and 39: Alternatives October 2005 • Shall
Page 40 and 41: Alternatives October 2005 Interstat
Page 42 and 43: Alternatives October 2005 Road). Pr
Page 44 and 45: Alternatives October 2005 Preferred
Page 46 and 47: Alternatives October 2005 Twin Peak
Page 48 and 49: Alternatives October 2005 I-10 Fron
Page 50 and 51: Alternatives October 2005 Linda Vis
Page 52 and 53: Alternatives October 2005 Twin Peak
Page 54 and 55: Alternatives October 2005 and sidew
Page 56 and 57: Alternatives October 2005 proposed
Page 58 and 59: Alternatives October 2005 Near the
Page 60 and 61: Avra Valley Rd. Twin Peaks Rd. Silv
Page 62 and 63: Affected Environment and Environmen
Page 78 and 79: Interstate 10 Traffic Interchange a
Page 120 and 121: Wall to Protect Rec. ID Affected En
Page 134 and 135:
Affected Environment and Environmen
Page 136 and 137:
44.20 Avra Valley Rd Twin Peaks Rd
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Public Involvement/Project Coordina
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Conclusion October 2005 Interstate
Page 178 and 179:
Bibliography October 2005 CHAPTER 8
Page 180 and 181:
Bibliography October 2005 Tetra Tec
show all

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?