01.03.2013 Views

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wall to<br />

Protect<br />

Rec. ID<br />

Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />

Total<br />

Units<br />

(Benefited)<br />

Table 4-8. Noise Mitigation Evaluation Summary<br />

2030<br />

Unmiti<br />

-gated<br />

Noise<br />

Level<br />

(dBA)<br />

2030<br />

Mitigated<br />

Noise<br />

Level<br />

(dBA)<br />

Barrier<br />

Insertion<br />

Loss<br />

(dBA)<br />

Barrier Dimensions Barrier Segment Costs<br />

Approximate<br />

Length<br />

(feet)<br />

Height<br />

(feet)<br />

Total<br />

Cost<br />

($20-25<br />

/square<br />

foot)<br />

Cost per<br />

Benefited<br />

Receiver<br />

LVR14 5 64 59 5 463 <strong>10</strong> $92,600 $18,520<br />

LVR15 64 59 5<br />

LVR16 1 64 Single isolated receiver – no barrier recommended<br />

LVR21 1 67 Single isolated receiver – no barrier recommended<br />

Note: Recommended walls are indicated by bolding<br />

Conclusion<br />

Figures 4-4a through 4-4d illustrate locations where walls would be constructed to<br />

protect impacted receivers. Although 49 of the 126 receiver locations were<br />

predicted to meet criteria for consideration of noise mitigation in the 2030 build<br />

condition, 11 of these locations were commercial properties; therefore, noise<br />

mitigation for these 11 properties was not considered. Noise barrier walls were<br />

analyzed in 13 locations to protect impacted residences. Of these locations, 6 walls<br />

would protect single isolated residences and would not be constructed per ADOT<br />

policy. One wall would protect three residences at a cost of $51,500 per residence;<br />

therefore, this wall was determined to not meet ADOT’s cost per benefited<br />

receiver criterion and was not recommended. Six locations were recommended for<br />

the construction of noise abatement walls. These six walls would protect a total of<br />

34 residences and would meet ADOT’s cost per benefited receiver criterion.<br />

Although the Town intends to construct these walls as described above, the final<br />

decision would be made following the public hearing process and discussions with<br />

affected property owners. The design parameters of these walls would be<br />

determined during final project design.<br />

In addition to mitigation using noise walls, resurfacing <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road west to<br />

Silverbell Road with RAC is proposed also. This treatment would improve<br />

drivability of the roadway and decrease the noise generation from the tire-pavement<br />

interface. Although the FHWA would not participate in the funding of roadway<br />

resurfacing with RAC, the Town of Marana would fund this overlay.<br />

Hazardous Materials<br />

It is important to locate sites of soil or groundwater contamination before<br />

performing construction activities. These contaminated properties could pose a<br />

physical danger to construction crews or be liabilities if construction causes<br />

contamination to migrate. To determine the potential of soil or groundwater<br />

Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />

4-63<br />

Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />

TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!