I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />
proximity impacts are so severe that the protected activities, features, or attributes<br />
that qualify a resource for protection under Section 4(f) are substantially impaired.<br />
Existing Conditions<br />
Several existing or proposed Section 4(f) resources are located within the study<br />
area. No wildlife and waterfowl refuge areas exist within the study area. Section<br />
4(f) resources near the project area are shown on Figure 4-7.<br />
Impacts<br />
No Build Alternative<br />
The no build alternative would not permanently incorporate, temporarily occupy,<br />
or constructively use 4(f) resources; therefore the no build alternative would have<br />
no impacts to Section 4(f) resources. The no build alternative would not improve<br />
access to or connectivity between recreational facilities or provide increased<br />
availability of bicycle or pedestrian facilities.<br />
Preferred Alternative<br />
Five Section 4(f) resources are located near the project area. Each of these<br />
resources and the potential impacts to each of the resources are discussed in the<br />
following paragraphs.<br />
<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Elementary School<br />
Description of Resource: <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Elementary School is a public school<br />
managed by the Marana Unified School District. <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Elementary’s<br />
outdoor recreational facilities (approximately 6 acres) are used by the general<br />
public outside school hours.<br />
Use of 4(f) Resource: <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Elementary is outside the area of construction<br />
for the proposed improvements and no temporary use of the recreational facilities<br />
would be required for construction purposes or temporary construction easements;<br />
therefore, the preferred alternative would not permanently nor temporarily<br />
incorporate any resources from this facility into a transportation facility. Although<br />
noise levels at the facility would increase with the preferred alternative, the noise<br />
analysis determined that the increase would not cause sound levels to exceed the<br />
FHWA’s NAC (see Noise section, page 4-49); therefore, no constructive use of the<br />
resource would occur. The preferred alternative would resurface <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road<br />
adjacent to the school; therefore, access to the resource may be temporarily<br />
impacted during this work. These temporary impacts would be minimized by a<br />
traffic control plan; therefore, no use of the 4(f) property would occur. The<br />
preferred alternative would improve overall access to this resource.<br />
Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />
<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />
4-90<br />
Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />
TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D