I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />
Proposed improvements to <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road, Linda Vista Boulevard, and El<br />
Camino de Mañana would impact vegetation in area of suitable habitat. Vegetation<br />
impacts in suitable habitat would be limited to riparian vegetation along the Santa<br />
Cruz River and desertscrub vegetation in upland areas along Linda Vista<br />
Boulevard and El Camino de Mañana. Prior to removal of vegetation during<br />
construction, the Town of Marana would develop a revegetation plan that would<br />
comply with the Arizona Native Plant Law (ANPL), and Native Plant Protection<br />
Ordinances (NPPO) of the Town of Marana and Pima County. In addition, the<br />
revegetation plan would include Corps’ recommendations from the TRDN<br />
Feasibility Study (see Mitigation below). As a result of the revegetation plan, the<br />
value of the vegetation in the disturbed area of the project area would be improved<br />
by construction of the preferred alternative.<br />
The preferred alternative is not likely to adversely affect CFPO or its habitat<br />
because: 1) although pygmy-owls do occur within mean dispersal distance of the<br />
study area, USFWS is not aware of any nesting pairs within this distance; 2)<br />
impacts to riparian vegetation would be temporary and would not permanently<br />
impede use of the Santa Cruz River as a movement corridor; 3) loss of desertscrub<br />
vegetation does not occur in areas used by pygmy-owls for nesting; 4) width of the<br />
proposed <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road and noise from traffic should not prevent movement of<br />
pygmy-owls across it; and, 5) the bridges over the Santa Cruz River would be of<br />
sufficient height to allow unimpeded wildlife movement underneath.<br />
The preferred alternative would result in disturbances to suitable habitat to the<br />
yellow-billed cuckoo. In addition, the species has been documented in the study<br />
area; therefore, the project may impact individual cuckoos, but is not likely to<br />
jeopardize the continued existence of yellow-billed cuckoos.<br />
The Section 7 of the ESA requires federal agencies to ensure that the actions they<br />
authorize, fund, or carry out do not jeopardize the continued existence of<br />
endangered species. To comply with Section 7 requirements, FHWA requested<br />
concurrence with the USFWS on August 4, 2004 which resulted in the USFWS<br />
concurring that the Preferred Alternative would not jeopardize the endangered<br />
CFPO nor the yellow-billed cuckoo in a letter dated December 21, 2004 (see<br />
Appendix B).<br />
Mitigation<br />
Prior to construction, the Town of Marana would develop a revegetation plan that<br />
would incorporate the mitigation discussed below. This revegetation plan would be<br />
provided to the contractor. Mitigation measures would include revegetation of<br />
impacted areas along the roadway and the riparian vegetation along the Santa Cruz<br />
River. Mitigation would include:<br />
• Disturbed soils would be re-seeded using species native to the project vicinity<br />
and would mirror the current plant composition to the extent possible.<br />
• Within upland areas, trees greater than 4 inches diameter at breast height and<br />
Saguaro cactus that are removed would be replaced within the overall<br />
Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />
<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />
4-31<br />
Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />
TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D