01.03.2013 Views

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />

The study area is a mix of land uses. The study area contains vacant, residential,<br />

commercial, public and institutional, and parks and open space land uses. The land<br />

uses planned within the study area exhibit a major loss of vacant land. Vacant land<br />

is replaced primarily by low density residential and master planned developments,<br />

corridor commerce, and conservation/mitigation land uses.<br />

Impacts<br />

No Build Alternative<br />

The no build alternative would not affect the existing rights-of-way or easements,<br />

or result in land acquisitions within the project area.<br />

Preferred Alternative<br />

The preferred alternative would acquire additional right-of-way (R/W) for<br />

roadway improvements and construction of the <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road TI and would<br />

acquire additional drainage easements. The proposed improvements would be in<br />

accordance with the Town of Marana and Pima County general plans.<br />

The preferred alternative would acquire a total of 72.4 acres of private and state or<br />

federal property for needed R/W. The proposed acquisitions are presented by<br />

proposed use of the property, number of acres by ownership type, and number of<br />

parcels affected in the following table.<br />

Proposed Use<br />

Extension of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong><br />

Road<br />

Reconstruction of eastbound<br />

I-<strong>10</strong> frontage road<br />

Table 4-1. Proposed Property Acquisitions<br />

State or<br />

Federal<br />

Property<br />

(acres)<br />

Number of<br />

Affected State<br />

or Federal<br />

Parcels<br />

Private<br />

Property<br />

(acres)<br />

Number of<br />

Affected<br />

Private<br />

Parcels<br />

15.7 6 28.1 12<br />

0.7 1 12.1 6<br />

Proposed access road 5.8 6 <strong>10</strong>.0 5<br />

In addition to the R/W for roadways, a number of new drainage easements would<br />

be required for the preferred alternative. These supplemental drainage easements<br />

would total 8.5 acres, and are detailed below. The channels and drainage structures<br />

are illustrated in Figure 3-19 in Chapter 3, Alternatives.<br />

Partial parcel acquisition could result in unusable or undesirable parcel sizes. For<br />

example, parcels could be created that may not meet minimum regulatory lot size<br />

requirements for septic tanks and/or private wells or may result in parcels that<br />

become undesirable for current uses. During individual property R/W negotiations,<br />

the effects of partial property takes would be considered.<br />

Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />

4-3<br />

Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />

TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!