I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Public Involvement/Project Coordination October 2005 locations. More complete descriptions of these meetings and summaries of comments may be found in Appendix A. • September 5, 2003 - Met with individual business and property owners along I-10 at Days Inn Conference Room (7 meetings) to introduce the project and solicit early concerns. • March 12, 2004- Met with business and property owners along I-10 at Marana Development Services (15 meetings) to present and receive comments on the alternatives. Hearing The Draft EA would be made available for public review and comment. To facilitate public involvement, a public hearing to explain the project and its environmental consequences would be held in the study area. Comments received at the public hearing and during the 30-day review and comment period would be incorporated into the Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) prepared for this project. The FEA would be used to determine the final environmental impacts for the project. Other On-Going Activities Throughout the final design and construction processes, efforts to inform and involve the community and businesses would be continued. A series of community meetings would be conducted at appropriate phases throughout the project. These meetings would inform the community of upcoming construction activities and the possible affects of these activities on the community and would offer the opportunity for the community and businesses to provide suggestions or comments that may minimize these affects. The meetings would be advertised in the same manner as the public information meetings for this project. Special efforts would be made to keep emergency services personnel informed of construction activities. Construction information would be available to the general public through regular briefings and information releases to newspapers, radio, and television. Conclusion To ensure that the public contributed to this study and had full access to study results, a number of public meetings and outreach efforts occurred and technical committees were formed. The design of the preferred alternative has been modified to address some of the concerns that have resulted from these public involvement efforts. After circulation of the Draft EA, a public hearing to explain the project and its environmental consequences would be held in the study area. Comments received would be addressed and incorporated into the FEA. A series of community meetings would be conducted at appropriate phases throughout the remainder of the proposed project. Construction information would be available to the general public through regular briefings and information releases. Interstate 10 Traffic Interchange at Twin Peaks/Linda Vista 5-12 Project No.: NH-010-D (AIW) TRACS No.: 10 PM 236 H5838 01D
Conclusion October 2005 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION The environmental impacts of the preferred alternative and the no build alternative were evaluated based on both the context of the effects on the project area and the intensity or severity of impacts as defined in the CEQ Regulations. Table 6-1 summarizes the environmental impacts. Table 6-1. Summary of Environmental Assessment Environmental Result of No Build Result of Preferred Consideration Alternative evaluation Alternative evaluation Land use No impacts Short-term minor negative impacts Long-term minor negative Land resources • Topography • Soils • Geologic setting/ mineral resources • Agriculture Water resources • Surface water • Ground water Water quality • Floodplains • Section 404/401 • AZPDES/SWPPP • Sole source aquifer Biological resources • Wildlife • Threatened/ endangered species • Arizona wildlife of concern • Critical habitat • Vegetation, riparian habitat, wetlands • Invasive species Interstate 10 Traffic Interchange at Twin Peaks/Linda Vista impacts No impacts Short-term minor negative impacts Long-term minor negative impacts Short-term moderate negative impacts Long-term moderate negative impacts Short-term minor negative impacts Long-term moderate beneficial impacts No impacts Short-term minor negative impacts No long-term negative impacts No impacts Short-term minor negative impacts No long-term negative impacts 6-1 Project No.: NH-010-D (AIW) TRACS No.: 10 PM 236 H5838 01D
Page 1:
Interstate 10 Traffic Interchange a
Page 4 and 5:
Draft Environmental Assessment Octo
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Mitigation Measures October 2005
Page 14 and 15:
Mitigation Measures October 2005 19
Page 16 and 17:
Mitigation Measures October 2005 St
Page 18 and 19:
Introduction October 2005 CHAPTER 1
Page 20 and 21:
AVRA VALLEY RD MARANA I-10 SCENIC D
Page 22 and 23:
Introduction October 2005 Cortaro R
Page 24 and 25:
Project Purpose and Need October 20
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Alternatives October 2005 CHAPTER 3
Page 36 and 37:
Alternatives October 2005 Figure 3-
Page 38 and 39:
Alternatives October 2005 • Shall
Page 40 and 41:
Alternatives October 2005 Interstat
Page 42 and 43:
Alternatives October 2005 Road). Pr
Page 44 and 45:
Alternatives October 2005 Preferred
Page 46 and 47:
Alternatives October 2005 Twin Peak
Page 48 and 49:
Alternatives October 2005 I-10 Fron
Page 50 and 51:
Alternatives October 2005 Linda Vis
Page 52 and 53:
Alternatives October 2005 Twin Peak
Page 54 and 55:
Alternatives October 2005 and sidew
Page 56 and 57:
Alternatives October 2005 proposed
Page 58 and 59:
Alternatives October 2005 Near the
Page 60 and 61:
Avra Valley Rd. Twin Peaks Rd. Silv
Page 62 and 63:
Affected Environment and Environmen
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Wall to Protect Rec. ID Affected En
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125: Affected Environment and Environmen
Page 136 and 137: 44.20 Avra Valley Rd Twin Peaks Rd
Page 164 and 165: Public Involvement/Project Coordina
Page 176 and 177: Conclusion October 2005 Interstate
Page 178 and 179: Bibliography October 2005 CHAPTER 8
Page 180 and 181: Bibliography October 2005 Tetra Tec
show all

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?