I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />
Noise mitigation is implemented where the efforts are feasible, reasonable,<br />
effective and desired by the affected community. Feasibility of mitigation<br />
measures is determined by considering factors such as local access constraints,<br />
safety, community aesthetics and cohesion, visual impact, engineering constraints<br />
of height, drainage considerations, and other engineering requirements.<br />
Reasonableness is based on the size of the impacted area (number of structures,<br />
spatial distribution of structures, etc.), the predominant activities exercised within<br />
the area, practicality of construction, and cost. Effectiveness criteria are based on<br />
the amount of noise reduction provided by a barrier (at least 5 dBA) and the<br />
barriers ability to reduce noise levels below 64 dBA. All of these factors were<br />
considered in this analysis. The analysis is summarized in Table 4-8 and is<br />
discussed briefly below by the same areas that were discussed earlier.<br />
<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road (Receivers NR26-NR32A and RS27-RS30)<br />
The homes with predicted substantial increases in traffic noise were along the east<br />
side of Continental Ranch both north and south of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road. Higher levels<br />
were predicted south of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road because of the roadway’s slight<br />
curvature to the south. Mitigation was considered on both the north and south sides<br />
of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road. It is important to note, however, that although these<br />
residences would experience a substantial increase in traffic noise levels according<br />
to ADOT criteria, the resultant noise levels are considerably below the levels at<br />
which mitigation is normally considered (64 dBA).<br />
A wall replacing the existing privacy wall along the east side of Continental Ranch<br />
north of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road was only marginally effective at mitigating noise.<br />
According to STAMINA, a 20-foot tall wall along the back yards of these<br />
residences would reduce predicted noise levels by 5 dBA or greater at only 3<br />
residences (NR26, NR26A, and NR27). A 20-foot tall wall 309 feet in length<br />
would result in a 5 dBA reduction at 3 residences for an approximate total cost of<br />
$154,500. The cost per benefited receiver would be $51,500 which is greater than<br />
the $35,000 per benefited receiver recommended by ADOT. Because of the<br />
expense, the wall’s height, and the limited number of homes that would benefit<br />
from the wall, this wall would not be constructed.<br />
A wall replacing the existing privacy wall along the east side of Continental Ranch<br />
on the south side of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road was effective at mitigating noise, but a very<br />
tall wall was necessary. A series of wall heights was examined in this area. Wall<br />
heights of ranging from 15 feet to 20 feet were examined. Because each of these<br />
walls protected varying numbers of homes, the most cost effective wall was<br />
selected. According to STAMINA, a 17-foot tall wall along the back yards of these<br />
residences would reduce predicted noise levels by 5 dBA or greater at 12<br />
residences (RS27, RS27A, RS28, RS28A, RS28B, RS28C, RS29, RS29A, RS29B,<br />
RS29C, RS29D, and RS29E). These results are presented in Table 4-8. A 17-foot<br />
tall wall 802 feet in length would result in a 5 dBA reduction at 12 residences for<br />
an approximate cost of $340,850. In addition, additional right of way would be<br />
acquired for the placement of the wall. Additional right of way costs in this area<br />
Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />
<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />
4-58<br />
Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />
TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D