01.03.2013 Views

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />

Noise mitigation is implemented where the efforts are feasible, reasonable,<br />

effective and desired by the affected community. Feasibility of mitigation<br />

measures is determined by considering factors such as local access constraints,<br />

safety, community aesthetics and cohesion, visual impact, engineering constraints<br />

of height, drainage considerations, and other engineering requirements.<br />

Reasonableness is based on the size of the impacted area (number of structures,<br />

spatial distribution of structures, etc.), the predominant activities exercised within<br />

the area, practicality of construction, and cost. Effectiveness criteria are based on<br />

the amount of noise reduction provided by a barrier (at least 5 dBA) and the<br />

barriers ability to reduce noise levels below 64 dBA. All of these factors were<br />

considered in this analysis. The analysis is summarized in Table 4-8 and is<br />

discussed briefly below by the same areas that were discussed earlier.<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road (Receivers NR26-NR32A and RS27-RS30)<br />

The homes with predicted substantial increases in traffic noise were along the east<br />

side of Continental Ranch both north and south of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road. Higher levels<br />

were predicted south of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road because of the roadway’s slight<br />

curvature to the south. Mitigation was considered on both the north and south sides<br />

of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road. It is important to note, however, that although these<br />

residences would experience a substantial increase in traffic noise levels according<br />

to ADOT criteria, the resultant noise levels are considerably below the levels at<br />

which mitigation is normally considered (64 dBA).<br />

A wall replacing the existing privacy wall along the east side of Continental Ranch<br />

north of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road was only marginally effective at mitigating noise.<br />

According to STAMINA, a 20-foot tall wall along the back yards of these<br />

residences would reduce predicted noise levels by 5 dBA or greater at only 3<br />

residences (NR26, NR26A, and NR27). A 20-foot tall wall 309 feet in length<br />

would result in a 5 dBA reduction at 3 residences for an approximate total cost of<br />

$154,500. The cost per benefited receiver would be $51,500 which is greater than<br />

the $35,000 per benefited receiver recommended by ADOT. Because of the<br />

expense, the wall’s height, and the limited number of homes that would benefit<br />

from the wall, this wall would not be constructed.<br />

A wall replacing the existing privacy wall along the east side of Continental Ranch<br />

on the south side of <strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong> Road was effective at mitigating noise, but a very<br />

tall wall was necessary. A series of wall heights was examined in this area. Wall<br />

heights of ranging from 15 feet to 20 feet were examined. Because each of these<br />

walls protected varying numbers of homes, the most cost effective wall was<br />

selected. According to STAMINA, a 17-foot tall wall along the back yards of these<br />

residences would reduce predicted noise levels by 5 dBA or greater at 12<br />

residences (RS27, RS27A, RS28, RS28A, RS28B, RS28C, RS29, RS29A, RS29B,<br />

RS29C, RS29D, and RS29E). These results are presented in Table 4-8. A 17-foot<br />

tall wall 802 feet in length would result in a 5 dBA reduction at 12 residences for<br />

an approximate cost of $340,850. In addition, additional right of way would be<br />

acquired for the placement of the wall. Additional right of way costs in this area<br />

Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />

4-58<br />

Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />

TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!