01.03.2013 Views

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

I-10 Twin Peaks Traffic Interchange, Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Impacts October 2005<br />

agreement, as revised to address research design for treatment of archaeological<br />

resources, has been followed for this proposed project and would continue to be<br />

followed throughout the remainder of the project.<br />

In addition, ADOT interim procedures for treating the historic state highway<br />

system were developed in 2002. These procedures require the collection and<br />

documentation of information from the historic highway before construction that<br />

would impact these facilities.<br />

SHPO Concurrence<br />

SHPO has reviewed the cultural resources report prepared for this project and has<br />

concurred with all of the eligibility findings except that of the Tucson-Casa<br />

Grande Highway. SHPO stated that the segment of roadway within the project area<br />

contributed to its eligibility to the NRHP and that a project specific treatment plan<br />

would be needed (see letter in Appendix D).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The cultural resources report prepared for this proposed project recommended a<br />

determination of adverse effect because of proposed project impacts on two<br />

National Register-eligible properties: the Tucson-Casa Grande Highway (SR 84)<br />

and the Stewart Brickyard archaeological site. A strategy for mitigating adverse<br />

effects on these facilities was developed. Potential impacts on four other nearby<br />

National Register-eligible properties were evaluated and the project was<br />

determined to have no adverse effect on the historic qualities that make those<br />

resources eligible. Three other resources within the area of potential effect were<br />

recommended as ineligible for the National Register, and two other previously<br />

recorded properties had been destroyed.<br />

Socioeconomics<br />

Demographics<br />

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the study area consisted of five census tracts<br />

within Pima County and the Town of Marana (Census Tracts 44.16, 44.20, 46.29,<br />

46.30, and 46.39), which represented a total 2000 population of 21,480. These<br />

census tracts are presented in Figure 4-5. Selected 2000 U.S. Census Bureau data<br />

from the five census tracts were compared to the same data for the Town of<br />

Marana, Pima County, and the State of Arizona in Table 4-<strong>10</strong>. Census data for<br />

these tracts is summarized in the following paragraphs.<br />

Census Tract 46.16 was the largest of the tracts, with a population of 8,841<br />

persons. Housing in this tract tended to be newer (94% constructed 1990 or after)<br />

and more frequently occupied by the owner (90.7%) when compared to the other<br />

tracts, the Town of Marana, Pima County, and Arizona. This tract also had a<br />

higher median family income ($60,172) when compared to the other tracts, the<br />

Town of Marana, Pima County, and Arizona. This census tract could be<br />

Interstate <strong>10</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Interchange</strong> at<br />

<strong>Twin</strong> <strong>Peaks</strong>/Linda Vista<br />

4-77<br />

Project No.: NH-0<strong>10</strong>-D (AIW)<br />

TRACS No.: <strong>10</strong> PM 236 H5838 01D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!