05.03.2013 Views

A Self-Learning Manual - Institution of Engineers Mauritius

A Self-Learning Manual - Institution of Engineers Mauritius

A Self-Learning Manual - Institution of Engineers Mauritius

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Learning</strong> <strong>Manual</strong><br />

Mastering Different Fields <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering Works (VC-Q&A Method) Vincent T. H. CHU<br />

for epoxy-coated bars, they extended the time taken for cracking to occur<br />

when compared with galvanized steel bars.<br />

The best corrosion resistant reinforcement among all is stainless steel. In<br />

particular, austenitic stainless steel stayed uncorroded even there was<br />

chloride contamination in concrete in the experiment. Reference is made to<br />

K. W. J. Treadaway (1988).<br />

14. Does the presence <strong>of</strong> rust have adverse impact to the bond<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> bar reinforcement? (SR4)<br />

In fact, the presence <strong>of</strong> rust in bars may not have adverse impact to the<br />

bond performance and it depends on the types <strong>of</strong> bar reinforcement under<br />

consideration.<br />

For plain round bars, the rust on bars improves the bond performance by<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> rough surfaces which increases the friction between steel<br />

and concrete.<br />

However, for deformed bars, the same theory cannot apply. The presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> rust impairs the bond strength because corrosion occurs at the raised<br />

ribs and subsequently fills the gap between ribs, thus evening out the<br />

original deformed shape. In essence, the bond between concrete and<br />

deformed bars originates from the mechanical lock between the raised ribs<br />

and concrete. On the contrary, the bond between concrete and plain round<br />

bars derives from the adhesion and interface friction. With such differences<br />

in mechanism in bonding, the behaviour <strong>of</strong> bond between deformed bars<br />

and plain round bars in the presence <strong>of</strong> rust varies. Reference is made to<br />

CIRIA Report 147.<br />

15. What is the difference in bonding performance to concrete<br />

between epoxy-coated bars and galvanized bars?<br />

Based on the findings <strong>of</strong> CEB Bulletin 211 [11], the bonding <strong>of</strong> galvanized<br />

bars to concrete is lower in early age owing to hydrogen release when zinc<br />

reacts with calcium hydroxide in concrete and the presence <strong>of</strong> hydrogen<br />

tend to reduce the bond strength between galvanized bars and concrete.<br />

However, bonding will increase with time until the full bond strength <strong>of</strong><br />

ungalvanized bars is attained.<br />

For epoxy-coated bars, there is a 20% decrease in bond strength for bars<br />

placed at the bottom <strong>of</strong> concrete sections while for bars placed on the top<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!