Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTRODUCTION<br />
5.1<br />
5.2<br />
5.3<br />
5.4<br />
5.5<br />
5.6<br />
Chapter 5<br />
DEVELOPING ADAPTIVE CAPACITY<br />
Societies have always had <strong>to</strong> adapt pragmatically <strong>to</strong> their current climate, with varying degrees<br />
of success (1.4). In the UK we can deal with most weather conditions reasonably well, but<br />
extreme weather can cause severe disruption – as the heatwaves of 2003, floods in 2007 and<br />
late 2009, and the cold weather at the end of 2009 and the start of 2010 demonstrated. Often<br />
these events lead <strong>to</strong> reviews, and lessons are learnt which increase our capacity <strong>to</strong> cope with<br />
similar events in future. But that learning can often be slow, and it is usually in reaction <strong>to</strong><br />
events rather than anticipa<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />
<strong>Climate</strong> change presents adaptation challenges of a different order: extreme events will occur<br />
more often, and will potentially be more extreme and more widespread. It will never be possible<br />
(or affordable) <strong>to</strong> plan <strong>to</strong> cope with all the circumstances which the country or local areas may<br />
face. But the Commission firmly believes that as a country we need <strong>to</strong> recognise that our vulnerability<br />
will increase, and that institutions should address this proactively and systematically on the<br />
basis of the principles set out in the previous chapter.<br />
We saw in Chapter 4 how institutions face four challenges when dealing with adaptation:<br />
uncertainty, complexity, path dependency, and equity and efficiency. In addressing these<br />
challenges, institutions will need <strong>to</strong> consider how <strong>to</strong> frame, incorporate learning and implement<br />
their approaches <strong>to</strong> adaptation. It is only by following these principles that institutions can build<br />
adaptive capacity soundly.<br />
Framing, implementation and learning are not linear processes but, rather, are flexible and iterative<br />
approaches for understanding and characterising the issues that emerge from the four high-level<br />
challenges. Of the many difficulties we have outlined in this report, it is common for organisations<br />
when faced with a problem <strong>to</strong> focus on what actions they need <strong>to</strong> take immediately, whereas often<br />
it would also be appropriate <strong>to</strong> concentrate on how <strong>to</strong> build capacity <strong>to</strong> frame, learn about, and<br />
implement appropriately. Then adaptation actions will not only be effective in the short term but<br />
can remain sufficiently flexible in the face of an uncertain climate in the longer term.<br />
The key message is that building adaptive capacity needs <strong>to</strong> be embedded as part of the routine<br />
business of institutions. The circles of adaptive capacity (Figure 4-III) provide a framework <strong>to</strong><br />
understand how the different components of adaptive capacity can be developed so that the<br />
challenges can be addressed.<br />
But how do organisations embed adaptation within their business? How can government ensure<br />
that the policy framework for delivering services and programmes is made more relevant <strong>to</strong> a<br />
world with a changing climate? Leadership and capacity building are the key prerequisites. We<br />
believe strongly that addressing these themes is essential if organisations are <strong>to</strong> frame, implement<br />
and learn successfully.<br />
95