Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 4<br />
FRAMING<br />
4.50<br />
4.51<br />
4.52<br />
FIGURE 4-II<br />
Schematic illustrating framing, implementing and learning<br />
Framing, implementing and learning are components of a fl exible, iterative, non-linear framework. Organisations<br />
will typically start by framing the problem. The components will often overlap, for example organisations<br />
will learn throughout their framing and implementing. Public engagement should support all three components.<br />
Framing<br />
Implementation Learning<br />
Framing a problem involves recognising its existence, and understanding its nature and its direct<br />
and indirect implications for the particular institution. This is perhaps the most challenging aspect<br />
of building adaptive capacity.<br />
Because adaptation is hard <strong>to</strong> frame, it is diffi cult <strong>to</strong> determine the actions <strong>to</strong> be taken and the<br />
capacities which should be built. It is easy <strong>to</strong> frame wrongly (for example by using the wrong<br />
timescales), incompletely (for example by thinking solely in terms of fl ood defence instead of<br />
fl ood risk management) or not at all. Because adaptation is hard <strong>to</strong> frame, it is also diffi cult <strong>to</strong><br />
defi ne ‘successful’ adaptation or metrics for measuring progress or outcome.<br />
The Commission identifi ed a set of issues <strong>to</strong> do with framing, relating <strong>to</strong> how institutions recognise<br />
the challenges of adaptation, the fac<strong>to</strong>rs involved, and how institutions recognise what they must<br />
do <strong>to</strong> build their adaptive capacity.<br />
76