Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.11<br />
4.12<br />
Figure 4-I also introduces the need for enhanced discussion, debate and negotiation as uncertainty<br />
increases and ambiguity or ignorance becomes evident. When there is a high level of knowledge<br />
about likelihoods and outcomes (<strong>to</strong>p-left quadrant, Figure 4-I) a focus on expert and agency<br />
engagement in risk assessments and cost–benefit analysis may be appropriate. However, the<br />
context of climate change adaptation is one where knowledge is uncertain, risk–benefit and<br />
risk–cost trade-offs become more complex, and issues of equity for current and future generations<br />
are important. In such circumstances a more open learning environment has <strong>to</strong> be created.<br />
Stakeholder and public engagement in the decision process become essential. Expert assumptions<br />
must be open <strong>to</strong> challenge, and other values and interests need <strong>to</strong> be heard and debated: what<br />
is widely referred <strong>to</strong> as ‘deliberative engagement’. Opening decision processes <strong>to</strong> deliberative<br />
participation or engagement inherently enhances both organisational and social learning. What<br />
is important is that climate change decision-makers and agencies understand from the outset<br />
that the adaptation problem is more likely <strong>to</strong> sit in the ‘ambiguity’ or ‘ignorance’ quadrants of<br />
Figure 4-I. This understanding should help <strong>to</strong> ensure the appropriate selection of decision <strong>to</strong>ols<br />
and engagement approaches.<br />
FIGURE 4-I<br />
Schematic representation of the different levels of understanding of risk, and<br />
example of approaches for decision making with different dimensions<br />
of uncertainty 2<br />
Knowledge<br />
about<br />
likelihoods<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Again, as seen in Chapter 2, a further source of considerable uncertainty about the future lies<br />
with the impact of other key drivers of social and technical change, such as an increasingly mobile<br />
population, future climate change mitigation efforts, or the state of the global economy. Many<br />
aspects of society will change in ways that are extremely difficult <strong>to</strong> forecast. Indeed, modelling<br />
the climate is relatively straightforward in comparison. <strong>Change</strong>s in society, both nationally and<br />
globally, and changes in technology will have an impact on the UK that is just as large, if not<br />
larger, than climate change itself. As a nation, we will have <strong>to</strong> adapt <strong>to</strong> climate change 50 or 100<br />
years from now in a world that is utterly different from ours, and in multiple ways that we can<br />
only dimly perceive.<br />
67<br />
Knowledge about outcomes<br />
<br />
RISK<br />
<br />
<br />
UNCERTAINTY<br />
<br />
AMBIGUITY<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
IGNORANCE<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Chapter 4