21.03.2013 Views

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.11<br />

4.12<br />

Figure 4-I also introduces the need for enhanced discussion, debate and negotiation as uncertainty<br />

increases and ambiguity or ignorance becomes evident. When there is a high level of knowledge<br />

about likelihoods and outcomes (<strong>to</strong>p-left quadrant, Figure 4-I) a focus on expert and agency<br />

engagement in risk assessments and cost–benefit analysis may be appropriate. However, the<br />

context of climate change adaptation is one where knowledge is uncertain, risk–benefit and<br />

risk–cost trade-offs become more complex, and issues of equity for current and future generations<br />

are important. In such circumstances a more open learning environment has <strong>to</strong> be created.<br />

Stakeholder and public engagement in the decision process become essential. Expert assumptions<br />

must be open <strong>to</strong> challenge, and other values and interests need <strong>to</strong> be heard and debated: what<br />

is widely referred <strong>to</strong> as ‘deliberative engagement’. Opening decision processes <strong>to</strong> deliberative<br />

participation or engagement inherently enhances both organisational and social learning. What<br />

is important is that climate change decision-makers and agencies understand from the outset<br />

that the adaptation problem is more likely <strong>to</strong> sit in the ‘ambiguity’ or ‘ignorance’ quadrants of<br />

Figure 4-I. This understanding should help <strong>to</strong> ensure the appropriate selection of decision <strong>to</strong>ols<br />

and engagement approaches.<br />

FIGURE 4-I<br />

Schematic representation of the different levels of understanding of risk, and<br />

example of approaches for decision making with different dimensions<br />

of uncertainty 2<br />

Knowledge<br />

about<br />

likelihoods<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Again, as seen in Chapter 2, a further source of considerable uncertainty about the future lies<br />

with the impact of other key drivers of social and technical change, such as an increasingly mobile<br />

population, future climate change mitigation efforts, or the state of the global economy. Many<br />

aspects of society will change in ways that are extremely difficult <strong>to</strong> forecast. Indeed, modelling<br />

the climate is relatively straightforward in comparison. <strong>Change</strong>s in society, both nationally and<br />

globally, and changes in technology will have an impact on the UK that is just as large, if not<br />

larger, than climate change itself. As a nation, we will have <strong>to</strong> adapt <strong>to</strong> climate change 50 or 100<br />

years from now in a world that is utterly different from ours, and in multiple ways that we can<br />

only dimly perceive.<br />

67<br />

Knowledge about outcomes<br />

<br />

RISK<br />

<br />

<br />

UNCERTAINTY<br />

<br />

AMBIGUITY<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

IGNORANCE<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Chapter 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!