21.03.2013 Views

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Index<br />

Loca<strong>to</strong>rs referring <strong>to</strong> definitions are in bold type. In subheadings, climate change is abbreviated as cc.<br />

adaptability Appendix A2<br />

adaptation 1.8–1.10, Appendix A2<br />

across Government departments 3.13<br />

business management approaches 4.46–4.48<br />

challenges <strong>to</strong> see challenges <strong>to</strong> adaptation<br />

difficulties in 1.18–1.20<br />

dynamism of 2.36<br />

local aspect of 1.13, 3.3<br />

and mitigation 1.11–1.13, 3.3, 3.65<br />

RCEP questions <strong>to</strong> organisations Box 5A<br />

test 5.13–5.14, 5.19<br />

urgency of 1.14<br />

see also adaptive capacity<br />

Adaptation Sub-Committee (ASC) of the<br />

Committee on <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong> 3.8<br />

RCEP recommendations <strong>to</strong> 5.11, 5.80–5.81<br />

role of 3.19, 3.109, Box 3A<br />

<strong>Adapting</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong> (ACC) Programme<br />

3.9, 3.11, 4.108, 4.112, 5.31, 5.51<br />

governance structure of 3.10, Figure 3–I<br />

work streams 3.12, Figure 3–II<br />

<strong>Adapting</strong> <strong>to</strong> climate change (European<br />

Commission) 2.102, 3.6<br />

<strong>Adapting</strong> <strong>to</strong> climate change (National Audit<br />

Office) 3.14<br />

adaptive capacity 1.4, 4.119, Figure 4–III, 5.1–<br />

5.11, 5.82–5.85, Appendix A2,<br />

Adaptation Sub-Committee see Adaptation<br />

Sub-Committee (ASC) of the Committee on<br />

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong><br />

equity 5.60–5.69<br />

and institutional arrangements 1.6<br />

land use planning system 5.33–5.37<br />

shortcomings of current system 5.38–5.46<br />

policy framework 5.12<br />

adaptation duty 5.19–5.21<br />

indica<strong>to</strong>rs 5.25–5.28<br />

investment appraisal 5.15–5.18<br />

160<br />

policy appraisal 5.13–5.14<br />

reporting/moni<strong>to</strong>ring 5.22–5.24<br />

public engagement 5.71–5.79<br />

RCEP questions <strong>to</strong> organisations Box 5A<br />

resources for 5.47<br />

commitment of 5.58–5.59<br />

knowledge and skills 5.53–5.57<br />

leadership and cultural change 5.48–5.52<br />

aggregate impacts Appendix A2<br />

agriculture 2.45, 2.54, 2.57, 4.89<br />

algae 2.50, 2.52<br />

alien species 2.92–2.94, Appendix A2<br />

Anglian Coastal Authorities Group 3.86–3.88<br />

anticipa<strong>to</strong>ry adaptation 1.4, 1.22–1.23, Box 1A,<br />

Appendix A2<br />

aquatic ecosystems 2.52, 2.59, 2.92, Box 3C<br />

Areas of Special Scientific Interest (ASSIs) 3.99<br />

Audit Commission 3.24, 3.25, 3.27, 4.108–4.109<br />

au<strong>to</strong>nomous adaptation Box 1A, Appendix A1,<br />

Appendix A2<br />

Barroso, José Manuel 3.6<br />

Bayesian probabilities 2.22<br />

biodiversity 2.103, 4.68, 4.84, Box 4D,<br />

Appendix A1<br />

alien species, introduction of 2.92–2.94<br />

aquatic 2.55, 2.59, 2.61<br />

climate envelopes and responses <strong>to</strong> cc<br />

2.83–2.91<br />

ecosystem services 2.102<br />

habitat change/loss 2.99–2.101<br />

institutional arrangements for 3.95–3.108<br />

life cycle timing 2.95–2.96<br />

RCEP recommendations for 5.42, 5.44<br />

species assemblages 2.97–2.98<br />

uncertainties about 4.14, 4.55<br />

see also nature conservation<br />

Biodiversity Action Partnership 2.99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!