21.03.2013 Views

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

Twenty-eighth Report Adapting Institutions to Climate Change Cm ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.84<br />

3.85<br />

3.86<br />

3.87<br />

74<br />

SMPs have a prominent role in the proposed planning policy on development and coastal change.<br />

It is proposed <strong>to</strong> encourage the use of an agreed evidence base, drawing primarily on SMPs, which<br />

will provide the means of identifying risks for a local area and offer proposals as <strong>to</strong> how <strong>to</strong> manage<br />

them. The SMP would then be a material consideration for decisions on planning applications.<br />

The Commission nevertheless noted that there is some confusion concerning the precise<br />

function of SMPs and how they align with the planning system. As mentioned above, SMPs<br />

are not management plans (for example, they have no means of implementation 75 and they are<br />

not statu<strong>to</strong>ry documents). They are described as providing an information base but, at the same<br />

time, they contain management scenarios which may be difficult <strong>to</strong> distinguish from proposals<br />

for policy. That said, they potentially form a very important high-level document from which<br />

strategies for coastal flooding and erosion risk management can be developed.<br />

During our study we received evidence from the Anglian Coastal Authorities Group concerning<br />

the draft SMP for the Kelling <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft coastline covering parts of Norfolk and Suffolk.<br />

First published in 2004, it recommended a policy of ‘no active intervention’ for some locations<br />

where it had previously been ‘hold the line’. In some areas where knowledge of this decision<br />

became widespread, properties and businesses were financially blighted; additionally there was<br />

a perception among local communities that no further protection or compensation would ever<br />

be offered. 76<br />

An important step in development of an SMP is public consultation. The revised SMP for Kelling<br />

<strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft was put <strong>to</strong> public consultation, but its initial preparation had lacked adequate or<br />

effective communication with the local communities. A particular concern of local communities<br />

was that in their view the SMP underestimated the social and economic value of property and<br />

activity in a given coastal location. Another issue concerned the lack of a mechanism <strong>to</strong> consider<br />

the social implications – such as disruption – and consequential losses for those whose homes<br />

would be lost. We return <strong>to</strong> this difficult issue in Chapter 5.<br />

FIGURE 3-VII<br />

Evidence of cliff erosion at the site of the old lifeboat launch along the coast<br />

from Happisburgh 77<br />

59<br />

Chapter 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!