23.03.2013 Views

download

download

download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RELIGIOUS LIFE AND ORGANIZATION 421<br />

one ofthe principal aims ofthe Gregorian reform had been to<br />

assert the free canonical election of a bishop by his chapter as<br />

against the claims of secular rulers, and free election continued<br />

to be the demand of the English bishops in the days of John,<br />

and was supported by Innocent III. For this reason the applica^<br />

tion to bishoprics ofthe centralizing tendencies ofthe thirteenth<br />

century was late in coming,<br />

and was in a sense the result rather<br />

than the cause of papal provision to smaller benefices.<br />

There, the ancient discipline had never changed. All minor<br />

benefices, from the days of the primitive Church, had been<br />

directly controlled by the diocesan, just as appointments in<br />

Rome fell to the pope as bishop of the city. When, therefore,<br />

lay control was being excluded, the bishop took his canonical<br />

place once more. The regime of the proprietary church, how<br />

ever, had shaken the whole fabric of tradition, and from the<br />

middle of the twelfth century onwards the papacy had begun<br />

first to solicit, then to demand, and ultimately to enforce the<br />

bestowal of a certain number of benefices throughout Europe<br />

for its proteges. Whatever the ultimate cause or causes of this<br />

change may have been inevitable or logical development, the<br />

natural tendency of lawyers to extend claims and precedents, or<br />

mere political advantage one of the most common uses to<br />

which this procedure was put was to provide or augment the<br />

income of the officials, high and low, ofthe Curia. Beginning<br />

with comparatively rare requests, the demands of the popes of<br />

the late twelfth century increased in frequency and urgency<br />

till by the middle of the following century the freedom of<br />

bishops in filling their churches and chapters was becoming<br />

notably curtailed. Paradoxically enough, the rights of lay<br />

patrons were consistently respected, though there was some<br />

friction in England between the courts Christian and the royal<br />

courts, both of which claimed the right of decision as to the<br />

fact of lay patronage.<br />

An important canonical step was taken by Clement IV in<br />

1265: while asserting the pope's right over all benefices he<br />

proclaimed his exclusive control over all those vacated by their<br />

holders while in the precincts of the Curia. John XXII

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!