29.03.2013 Views

The Revelation of Jesus Christ - The Herald

The Revelation of Jesus Christ - The Herald

The Revelation of Jesus Christ - The Herald

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

own origin), declares Himself to be, '<strong>The</strong> faithful and true witness, the beginning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> God.'"<br />

<strong>The</strong> Savior continues to address the Church and the messenger <strong>of</strong> the Laodiceans, in the<br />

words: "I know thy works that thou art neither cold nor hot; I would thou wert cold or<br />

hot." (Verse 15.) This expression is, <strong>of</strong> course, figurative. To be "cold," in the sense here<br />

suggested, would imply a condition where there was no pretension <strong>of</strong> religion. To be "hot"<br />

denotes the very opposite--a state <strong>of</strong> fervency, warm and zealous in the love and service <strong>of</strong><br />

the Master. <strong>The</strong> state or condition reproved here is that <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christ</strong> with no<br />

warmhearted love and service which He desired and had a right to expect <strong>of</strong> those who<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essed to be His ministers, His followers. Lukewarmness is the word in the next verse.<br />

"I would that thou wert either cold or hot" is used to express this condition. <strong>The</strong> meaning<br />

is that <strong>Christ</strong> would prefer no pr<strong>of</strong>ession at all to one that was <strong>of</strong> a hypocritical character,<br />

where there was no glow <strong>of</strong> warm affection. <strong>The</strong> reason is most obvious. Evidently a cold<br />

state is preferable to <strong>Christ</strong> than that <strong>of</strong> lukewarmness. <strong>The</strong> cold, non-pr<strong>of</strong>essing<br />

unbeliever represents a more honest condition. He could not be specially responsible in his<br />

ignorance and would not therefore be blameworthy to the extent <strong>of</strong> the one who had some<br />

enlightenment and pr<strong>of</strong>essed to be a follower <strong>of</strong> <strong>Christ</strong>, but was not living up to his<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession. It would be far better to be even antagonistic to <strong>Christ</strong>, than to make a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession to be His ministers, His followers, to make vows <strong>of</strong> consecration, and then<br />

manifest indifference in fulfilling them. On the part <strong>of</strong> the non-pr<strong>of</strong>essor, there is no<br />

concealment, no pretense. <strong>The</strong> one is a condition <strong>of</strong> either being deceived or <strong>of</strong> insincerity,<br />

if not hypocrisy. <strong>The</strong> other is generally, at least, honest. Honesty is one quality absolutely<br />

necessary to become a true disciple and have the Word <strong>of</strong> God take root, as <strong>Christ</strong> taught<br />

in parable: "But that on the good ground are they, which, in an honest and good heart,<br />

having heard [understood] the Word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience."--Luke<br />

8:15.<br />

It has been truly said <strong>of</strong> insincere ones or hypocrites:<br />

"Of a man who is false to his engagements; who makes pr<strong>of</strong>essions and promises never to<br />

be realized, we can make nothing. <strong>The</strong>re is essential meanness in such a character, and<br />

there is nothing in it which we can respect. But, in the character <strong>of</strong> the man who is openly<br />

and avowedly opposed to anything; who takes his stand, and is earnest and zealous in his<br />

course, though it be wrong, there are traits which may be, under a better direction,<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> true greatness and magnanimity. In the character <strong>of</strong> Saul <strong>of</strong> Tarsus, there were<br />

always the elements <strong>of</strong> true greatness; in that <strong>of</strong> Judas Iscariot, there were never. <strong>The</strong> one<br />

was capable <strong>of</strong> becoming one <strong>of</strong> the noblest men that has ever lived on the earth; the other,<br />

even under the personal teaching <strong>of</strong> the Redeemer for years, was nothing but a traitor--a<br />

man <strong>of</strong> essential meanness. . . . <strong>The</strong> most hopeless <strong>of</strong> all persons, in regard to salvation, are<br />

those who are [pr<strong>of</strong>ess to be] members <strong>of</strong> the Church without any true religion; who have<br />

made a pr<strong>of</strong>ession without any evidence <strong>of</strong> personal piety; who are content with a name to<br />

live. This is so, because (a) the essential character <strong>of</strong> any one who will allow himself to do<br />

this, is eminently unfavorable to true religion. <strong>The</strong>re is a lack <strong>of</strong> that thorough honesty and<br />

sincerity which is so necessary for true conversion to God. He who is content to pr<strong>of</strong>ess to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!