29.03.2013 Views

The Revelation of Jesus Christ - The Herald

The Revelation of Jesus Christ - The Herald

The Revelation of Jesus Christ - The Herald

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

would be a brief one. However, it is reasonable to suppose this would be the case in view<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Divine rule <strong>of</strong> progressive interpretation <strong>of</strong> prophecy.<br />

In proving the above statements we quote first Irenaeus. In his book "Against Heresies,"<br />

chapter 26, he says, "John in the Apocalypse . . . teaches us what the ten horns shall be,<br />

[that is, the same] which were seen by Daniel."<br />

We thus see that this <strong>Christ</strong>ian writer, who lived only about half a century after St. John's<br />

day, linked together the vision <strong>of</strong> Daniel 7 with those visions that make up the much larger<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the Apocalypse.<br />

Another quotation from Irenaeus (Book V, chap. 30) shows that he believed that the<br />

manifestation <strong>of</strong> Antichrist would require first the overthrow <strong>of</strong> the Empire <strong>of</strong> Rome then<br />

existing. <strong>The</strong> quotation reads:<br />

"Let them await, in the first place, the division <strong>of</strong> the kingdom into ten; then in the next<br />

place, when these kings are reigning, and beginning to set their affairs in order, and<br />

advance their kingdoms, let them learn to acknowledge, that he who shall come claiming<br />

the kingdom [dominion] for himself . . . and containing the aforesaid number (666), is truly<br />

the abomination <strong>of</strong> desolation."<br />

It seems clear that this writer, who in all probability saw those who had conversed with St.<br />

John, believed that the Apocalypse was already beginning to have its fulfillment in his day<br />

(145 AD). His forecast, although he was ignorant <strong>of</strong> it, covered nearly four centuries, for it<br />

is an indisputable fact <strong>of</strong> history that in 476 AD the Roman Empire fell, and shortly after,<br />

in about 539 AD, the Bishop <strong>of</strong> Rome was occupying the seat <strong>of</strong> the Roman emperors in<br />

the city <strong>of</strong> Rome, and was claiming supremacy in religious matters over all peoples <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Roman earth; and at this time the territory <strong>of</strong> the Empire was occupied by ten kingdoms.<br />

Hippolytus, who is said to have been a disciple <strong>of</strong> Irenaeus, held that the Babylon <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Apocalypse meant Rome. Referring to this he says: "Tell me, blessed John, apostle and<br />

disciple <strong>of</strong> the Lord, what didst thou see and hear concerning Babylon? Arise and speak<br />

for it sent thee also into banishment."<br />

Indeed, all the early <strong>Christ</strong>ian writers held to this view. Tertullian, who lived<br />

contemporary with Irenaeus and Hippolytus, thus writes: "Babylon in our own John, [that<br />

is, the Apocalypse] is a figure <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Rome, as being equally proud <strong>of</strong> her sway over<br />

the saints."<br />

Augustine, who was born 354 AD, in his book, City <strong>of</strong> God, says: "Rome, the second<br />

Babylon, and the daughter <strong>of</strong> the first, to which it pleased God to subject the whole world,<br />

and bring it all into one sovereignty is now founded." In another place he calls Rome, "the<br />

western Babylon." In still another he says: "It has not been in vain that this city has<br />

received the mysterious name <strong>of</strong> Babylon; for Babylon is interpreted confusion, as we have<br />

said elsewhere."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!