03.04.2013 Views

THE STORY OF PHILOSOPHY2 The Lives and Opinions

THE STORY OF PHILOSOPHY2 The Lives and Opinions

THE STORY OF PHILOSOPHY2 The Lives and Opinions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FRANCIS BACON 109<br />

be accepts the world blithely enough; he is not consumed with the reconstructive<br />

vision that ennobled Plato, or Nietzsche, or Bacon.<br />

Now the greatness <strong>and</strong> the weakness of Bacon lay precisely in his pas-<br />

sion for unity, his desire to spread the wings of his coordinating geniu?<br />

over a hundred sciences. He aspired to be like Plato, "a man of sublime<br />

genius, who took a view of everything as from a lofty rock." He broke<br />

down under the weight of the tasks he had laid upon himself; he failed<br />

forgivably because he undertook so much. He could not enter the<br />

promised l<strong>and</strong> of science, but as Cowley's epitaph expressed it, he could<br />

at least st<strong>and</strong> upon its border <strong>and</strong> point out its fair features in the<br />

distance.<br />

His achievement was not the less great because it was indirect. His<br />

philosophical works, though little read now, "moved the intellects which<br />

moved the world." 109 He made himself the eloquent voice of the optimism<br />

<strong>and</strong> resolution of the Renaissance. Never was any man so great a stimulus<br />

to other thinkers. King James, it is true, refused to accept his suggestion<br />

for the support of science, <strong>and</strong> said of the Novum Organum that "it was<br />

like the peace of God, which passeth all underst<strong>and</strong>ing." But better men,<br />

in 1662, founding that Royal Society which was to become the greatest<br />

association of scientists in the world, named Bacon as their model <strong>and</strong><br />

inspiration; they hoped that this organization of English research would<br />

lead the way toward that Europe-wide association which the Advancement<br />

of Learning had taught them to desire. And when the great minds<br />

of the French Enlightenment undertook that masterpiece of intellectual<br />

enterprise, the Encyclopedic, they dedicated it to Francis Bacon. "If,"<br />

said Diderot in the Prospectus, "we have come of it successfully, we shall<br />

owe most to the Chancellor Bacon, who threw out the plan of an universal<br />

dictionary of sciences <strong>and</strong> arts, at a time when, so to say, neither arts nor<br />

sciences existed. That extraordinary genius, when it was impossible to<br />

write a history of what was known, wrote one of what it was necessary<br />

to learn." D'Alembert called Bacon "the greatest, the most universal, <strong>and</strong><br />

the most eloquent of philosophers." <strong>The</strong> Convention published the works<br />

of Bacon at the expense of the state. 110 <strong>The</strong> whole tenor <strong>and</strong> career of<br />

British thought have followed the philosophy of Bacon. His tendency to<br />

conceive the world in Democritean mechanical terms gave to his secretary,<br />

Hobbes, the starting-point for a thorough-going materialism; his induc-<br />

tive method gave to Locke the idea of an empirical psychology, bound by<br />

observation <strong>and</strong> freed from theology <strong>and</strong> metaphysics; <strong>and</strong> his emphasis<br />

on "commodities" <strong>and</strong> "fruits" found formulation in Bentham's identifi-<br />

cation of the useful <strong>and</strong> the good.<br />

Wherever the spirit of control has overcome the spirit of resignation,<br />

Bacon's influence has been felt. He is the voice of all those Europeans who<br />

have changed a continent from a forest into a treasure-l<strong>and</strong> of art <strong>and</strong><br />

""Macaulay, p. 49 i*<br />

UX)<br />

Nichol, ii, 235.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!