06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONTEXT PINK OR ROSE COLOR.<br />

pale rosy color (buff pink). Context thin, hard. Pores medium to<br />

large, ]4 mm. round, at length long, sinuate, daedaloid, ^2 x 2 mm.<br />

rigid, with thin walls. Tissue concolorous.<br />

A number of specimens are at Kew from Brazil, also a collection<br />

from Malay. I know no other from the East. At Paris, Montagne<br />

Fig. 579.<br />

Trametes cupreo-rosea.<br />

got it also from Brazil and referred it to Sagraeana of Cuba, which<br />

has much smaller pores. I have never gotten it from Rev. Rick, who<br />

finds Trametes Feei abundantly, nor have I ever seen specimens from<br />

the West Indies.<br />

TRAMETES ROSEOLA. Pileus sessile, narrow behind, (8 x<br />

lQxlJ/2 cm.), thinner towards the margin, firm. Surface dirty rose<br />

color, not zoned, slightly rugulose. Context punky, dry, pale salmon,<br />

(light ochraceous salmon). Pores minute, rigid, 1-2 mm. long.<br />

Spores globose, hyaline, 4-5 mic.<br />

This is a fine species, recently named from Africa. It is quite<br />

close to Trametes plebeia -as to color, but differs as to context. It<br />

proves quite common in Africa, and I have specimens from Ceylon<br />

and Japan. How it escaped a name to such a late day I am not able<br />

to state.<br />

TRAMETES PLEBEIA. Pileus applanate, with thin edge,<br />

hard, rigid, nearly unicolor. Context, surface, and pores pinkish<br />

cinnamon. Surface smooth, dull, minutely velutinate, soft to the<br />

touch. Context hard, rigid. Pores minute, round, with thick walls.<br />

Why Berkeley called this "plebeia" I do not know, for it is neither<br />

"common" in appearance nor occurrence. He named it from New<br />

Zealand, but recorded it also from India. The New Zealand specimen<br />

is not preserved, but we assume it was the same as the India<br />

specimen which is in existence, especially as the "description" covers<br />

it. It is not right to charge Berkeley with not knowing his own<br />

species when one has no evidence, and can only assume it as a prob-<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!