06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GANODERMUS.<br />

other specimens of Fomes applanatus, determined as being Fomes galegensis, but<br />

none with the same crust feature of the type at Paris. We hardly think it possible<br />

to maintain it even as a form.<br />

FOMES (?) REXIFORMIS. Same as Fomes applanatus as to crust, context<br />

color, pores, but differs in being annual and forming new pilei each year. The<br />

spores are distinctly rough, in some specimens at least. Morgan observed a plant<br />

to be annual that otherwise seemed the same as Fomes applanatus, a perennial<br />

plant. It can be generally recognized by bearing the dead pileus of the previous<br />

year. Whether it is a distinct species or not is a question, and also it is a question<br />

if it should be classed as an annual form of Fomes applanatus. The spores are<br />

certainly in some specimens more asperate, but otherwise we doubt if the pileus<br />

alone could be told from the first year's growth of Fomes applanatus, the type form<br />

of Europe, and we do not know that the spore difference is pronounced enough to<br />

distinguish them. It is quite frequent around Cincinnati, usually on rotten stumps<br />

near the ground. As it occurs fresh the pore mouths are white, but we have a number<br />

of collections (including a "type" from Morgan) with yellowish pore mouths. We<br />

think these with yellow mouths are entitled to a name, but we do not propose one.<br />

SPECIMEN'S. Many, mostly of our own collection.<br />

Compare lobatus.<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!