06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SYNONYMS, MISTAKES, SPECIES IMPERFECTLY KNOWN<br />

OR NOT KNOWN AT ALL, ETC.<br />

acupunctatus, Ceylon, Berkeley. Type is resupinate, fragments said to consist<br />

of three species.<br />

Aegerita, Mexico, Fries. Xo type exists. Described as white with white,<br />

floccose context. Description would indicate Fomes Laricis.<br />

albogriseus, United States, Peck. Based on a young specimen of Fomes<br />

Laricis.<br />

albo-limbatus, Africa, Cooke. Xo type found by me.<br />

albo-marginatus, Java, Leveille. = Fomes kermes. The "white margin" is<br />

"remarquable" for its absence not only from the type at Leiden, but from all the<br />

many collections in the museums. It was thus misnamed through pure incompetency,<br />

and the maintenance of such a misnomer is, in my opinion, without merit.<br />

Alni, Asia, Sorokin. Xo specimen seen nor the figure. I presume it was<br />

Fomes roseus or Fomes pinicola. Either of them is probably a bad guess.<br />

angulus, Japan, <strong>Lloyd</strong>. Pidgin latin for Fomes angularis.<br />

anisopilus, Java, Leveille. Never was a "Fomes," but a thin Polystictus.<br />

(Cfr. Letter 36.)<br />

apiahynus, Brazil, Spegazzini. Unknown. From the description it is impossible<br />

to tell eVen to what it is related.<br />

aratus, United States, Saccardo. Change of Ganodermus sulcatus, which<br />

would not have been necessary had it been compiled in Vol. 21 instead of Vol. 17.<br />

It is a synonym for Fomes zonatus.<br />

Auberianus, Cuba, Montagne. = Fomes lignosus. In the sense of early<br />

American mycology' as determined in Europe for Langlois = Fomes geotropus.<br />

aulaxinus, Java, Bresadola. There is a cotype at Kew. I cannot note how it<br />

can be distinguished from Fomes McGregorii.<br />

balabacensis, Philippines, Murrill, = Polyporus pediformis.<br />

bambusinus, China, Patouillard. This, as described, is a Polyporus rather<br />

than a Fomes, as compiled in Saccardo. It resembles closely Polyporus licnoides as<br />

to pores, color, setae, and spores. It bears colored, conidial spores of a different<br />

type from its basidial spores. I would consider it a species of Polyporus, closely<br />

related to Polyporus gilvus.<br />

bistratosus, Brazil, Berkeley. Type a "resupinate" piece, a Poria.<br />

Bonianus, China, Patouillard. Bresadola has referred this to Fomes pectinatus.<br />

I think the type in Patouillard's herbarium is not Fomes pectinatus, but<br />

Polyporus capucinus.<br />

Brownii, Europe, Humboldt, = Fomes rufo-flavus, teste Bresadola.<br />

brunneo-griseus, South America, Patouillard. Xot seen by me. Flesh brown.<br />

"Spores hyaline, 5x6." Seems to belong to the fomentarius group.<br />

Cajanderi, Siberia, Karsten. Unknown. Xothing can be inferred from the<br />

description.<br />

caliginosus, Borneo, Cesati. The cotype at Kew is the same as caliginosus of<br />

Berkeley. Henning renamed Cesati's species (or rather Cesati's name) Fomes<br />

Cesatianus, which was hardly necessary-.<br />

canaliculatus, Java, Patouillard. Unknown to me. Compared by author to<br />

Fomes rufo-flavus.<br />

castaneus, Europe, Fries. Unknown, name change of populneus of Pollini.<br />

The figure Pollini cited I have not located, but the description seems to be Fomes<br />

annosus.<br />

Cedrelae, Jamaica, Murrill, = Fomes rimosus.<br />

cereus, Brazil, Rick (Xo. 108 attributed to Berkeley). There is some error,<br />

as no such species was published by Berkeley. I would class it as a Trametes, and<br />

have labeled the specimen Trametes farcta. Its relations are with Polyporus gilvus.<br />

278

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!