06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

luridescens, Jamaica, Murrill. Based on old weathered and discolored specimens<br />

of Polyporus obtusus.<br />

luteo-cinereus, Europe, Britzelmayr. Unknown. Said to have white context<br />

and pores, and colored spores. Noteworthy if true, but probably not ture. Britzelmayr<br />

was a great discoverer of things that probably do not exist.<br />

luteiporus, Europe, Opiz. Xomen nudum.<br />

Macouni, United States, Peck. No type exists. Given in Saccardo as a<br />

variety of Polyporus dichrous which seems to have been a bad guess unless Polyporus<br />

dichrous has changed its spore shape since. Instead of being "globose" they are<br />

"rod shape" in Polyporus dichrous.<br />

MacOwani, Africa, Kalchbrenner = Polyporus adustus. Type at Kew.<br />

macroporus, Java, Leveille. Xo type known, nor any plant known that is<br />

"comparable to Polyporus hispidus but covered with a thick, hard scaly crust."<br />

macroporus, Europe, Britzelmayr. Unknown. Carton not found by me.<br />

maculatus, United States, Peck. Changed to Polyporus guttulatus but is<br />

a synonym for Polyporus alutaceus of Europe.<br />

Marianus, Pacific Islands, Persoon. The type a single specimen in poor condition<br />

is at Paris. I believe it to be Polyporus anebus of this pamphlet and if true,<br />

a very much earlier name for it. The specimen was glued to paper so that the<br />

surface does not show. It may be the red stained form called Polyporus bicolor.<br />

maritimus, Europe, Quelet. Unknown to any one I think. Quelet sent Fries<br />

a specimen but there is nothing left of it now. Said to have fusiform spores 10-12<br />

mic. long. General description reads something like alutaceus excepting as to<br />

spores.<br />

Martellii, Europe,<br />

Mexicanus, (bis)<br />

Bresadola. A form of Polyporus resinaceus.<br />

Mexico, Patouillard. Unknown to me. Compared to<br />

lacteus.<br />

I<br />

micromegas, Cuba, Montagne. Types small and unsatisfactory are at Paris.<br />

think they are same as Polyporus guadelupensis. They have been referred to<br />

Polyporus zonalis but are different in my opinion.<br />

microscopicus, Java, Junghuhn. No type found by me.<br />

microstomus, Cuba, Berkeley = Polyporus concrescens.<br />

Mollerianus, Africa, Saccardo. This teste Bresadola is a stipitate form of<br />

Polyporus vinosus. It seems to occur in Africa only. At Kew is a specimen which<br />

is exactly Polyporus vinosus in every character excepting it is reduced to the base<br />

to a short stipe. We use the name (page 342) as a form name.<br />

mollicomus, Europe, Britzelmayr. The description reads like Polyporus<br />

borealis. The cartoon I did not locate. His cartoon of Polyporus borealis has<br />

not the most remote resemblance to Polyporus borealis, hence you can draw your<br />

own conclusions, which is more than you can do as to most of the crude sketches<br />

of this modern European "scientist."<br />

mollissimus, China, Patouillard. Unknown to me. Compared to Polyporus<br />

spumeus.<br />

molluscus, Europe, Karsten. Unknown. From description appears to be<br />

the white form of Polyporus amorphus.<br />

monochrous, Cuba, Berkeley = Polyporus capucinus. This was a mss. name<br />

for Wright No. 158 which when published was referred to Polyporus chrysites.<br />

morosus, Europe, Kalchbrenner = Polyporus benzoinus. Specimens de Thum<br />

713 and Rabenhorst 1605 in several museums. In Austria it is said to be "rarissime"<br />

which may explain why Kalchbrenner discovered it to be a "new species".<br />

nauseosus, West Indies, Patouillard. Not seen by me. Said to be a white<br />

species with viscid pileus and foetid odor. Viscid Polyporus are rare. Murrill<br />

who has skimmed over Patouillard's herbarium, merely informs us that it is a<br />

"doubtful species" but what the "doubt" is about he does not state.<br />

nidulans, Europe, Fries = Polyporus rutilans. The Friesian name has been<br />

generally used in America. Both are legal now, so you can take your choice. If<br />

Blytt's specimen of "rutilans Fries in Litt." is correct, Fries had no conception of<br />

Persoon's species, and as Persoon gave such a fine illustration of Polyporus rutilans<br />

there was not a bit of excuse for Fries to rename it.<br />

nigro-purpurascens, United States, Schweinitz = Polyporus dichrous as announced<br />

some fifty-odd years ago.<br />

nitidulus, Japan, Berkeley. Type little remnants from which nothing can<br />

382

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!