06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3-5 mm. thick, white, fleshy. Spores subglobose, piriform, with a minute apiculus,<br />

4-4%x4 1 /2-5 hyaline, smooth, guttulate.<br />

This is a species of Polyporus, remarkable in being truly viscid. But one other has<br />

been noted to my knowledge, ^iz., Polyporus viscosus, and that proved to be not a Polyporus,<br />

but a Boletus. Polyporus Yasudai evidently grows caespitose. Probably on wood,<br />

but the collector does not state. It should be entered in Section 45c in my recent<br />

pamphlet.' The drawing of the fresh plant submitted by Prof. Yasuda is bluish gray, as<br />

are his collection notes, but the blue has largely disappeared in the dried specimens,<br />

and reddish brown would more nearly characterize them now.<br />

NOTE 60. Correction. The arms of Lysurus borealis are attached to the apex of<br />

the stem instead of the base as stated on p. 513 of <strong>Mycological</strong> Notes.<br />

The spores of "Tommyrot colossus" were given a little larger, 5 or 6 mic., instead of<br />

4 mic., as stated on p. 7 of Letter 43.<br />

As my manuscript is largely prepared by dictation, these little obvious slips are often<br />

occurring, although we try to take every precaution to avoid them.<br />

NOTE 61. Fomes pectinatus as found in Quelet and embalmed in the traditions of<br />

Europe is a misdetermination for Fomes ribis. Fomes pectinatus is a tropical species<br />

and does not occur in Europe.<br />

NOTE 62. Fomes Rhaponticus. Pileus sessile, 1-2 inches thick, 3-5 inches broad.<br />

Context bright rhei color, with a peculiar shining effect and faintly zonate. Hyphae<br />

bright yellow. Crust thin, smooth, subconcolorous. Pores minute, the indistinct layer<br />

5-6 mm. thick, concolorous and with concolorous mouths. Setae rare, acute, with<br />

swollen bases. Spores subglobose, 10 x 12 mic. smooth, colored.<br />

The context is not as hard and ligneous as most Fomes, but the annual layers<br />

can be distinguished both in the pores and context. In its color and other characters<br />

it is quite close to Polyporus dryadeus, an annual plant of Europe, and differs in its<br />

perennial nature, and in its harder, smoother "crust. It is also quite close to Fomes<br />

robustus of Europe, similar color and setae, but robustus has hyaline spores, and harder<br />

context.<br />

Type specimens (Nos. 21 and 34) from Jintaro Umemuro, Mikawa, Japan, growing<br />

on Quercus.<br />

NOTE 63. Fomes scaurus. Plant with an irregular, stipe-like base. Entire plant<br />

and context dark brown, the upper surface paler. Pileus thin, 3-8 mm. thick, with a<br />

smooth, rugulose crust. Pores minute, brown with concolorous mouths. Setae none.<br />

Spores globose 4-5 mic., very pale colored.<br />

This plant is out of the ordinary. While it has a "stipe," it is not distinct and<br />

well formed, and its relations are closer to the sessile section. In its general color and<br />

appearance, also microscopic characters, it is close to Fomes ribis. The. spores are so<br />

scanty I am not sure about them. They seem to be pale colored, but are almost hyaline.<br />

We have received two collections from A. Yasuda, Sendai, Japan (No. 12 and<br />

No. Z), and Mr. Yasuda assures us the plant always has this stipe-like base. We referred<br />

incidentally to the plant in our Stipitate Polyporoids on page 195. If classed<br />

as stipitate, it could be entered in section Pelleporus for want of a better place, but<br />

it should be classed, we believe, with Fomes ribis.<br />

MINNESOTA MUSHROOMS.<br />

"Minnesota Mushrooms" is the title of a publication (Part 4) of Minnesota Plant<br />

Studies. Although the work was issued in 1910, it nas just come to our notice. We were<br />

in Europe when the work appeared. The author is F. E. Clements, State Botanist of<br />

Minnesota. -,- :<br />

While, of course, the work is not exhaustive, we think it will prove one of the most<br />

useful publications on American mycology, particularly to those who are not familiar<br />

with the common species. It is well illustrated with photographic cuts that are characteristic<br />

enough, so that the common fungi of the woods can mostly be easily identified. The<br />

author should be strongly commended for two things:<br />

First, he used binomials as the names for the plants, and made no reference to the<br />

biographical citations to those who are alleged to have named them. The general adoption<br />

of this plan would cause very rapid advancement in mycology, for the mycologi^al worker<br />

would then be more interested in finding out the truth than he would be in proposing as<br />

II

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!