06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tiliophila, United States, Murrill. Based on a thick specimen of Polyporus<br />

alutaceus.<br />

tomentoso-quercinus, United States, Johnson. Amateur work of which no<br />

type exists but from the description no doubt that Murrill has correctly referred<br />

it to Polyporus obtusus.<br />

Torreyi, United States, Gerard as var. of Polyporus volvatus. Based on<br />

specimens abnormally stiped.<br />

trachodes, Java, Leveille = Polyporus scruposus which is a form of Polyporus<br />

gilvus.<br />

trichocoma, Tahiti, Fries. No type exists.<br />

tristis, Europe, Persoon. No type in Persoon's herbarium. Fries thought it<br />

might be abietinus, but description seems to me to point to the large pored form<br />

of Polyporus adustus, viz., Polyporus crispus.<br />

tristis, Europe, Roumeguere as Trametes (sic) is the common Polyporus adustus<br />

tristis, Java, Leveille. No type found by me = Polyporus vinosus it is stated<br />

tumidus, Africa, Bresadola. Unknown to me. It belongs to section 103<br />

which has now more named species than it is practical to maintain. They are all<br />

very much alike.<br />

tyrolensis, Europe, Saccardo. Change of Polyporus Schulzeri which is probably<br />

obtusus.<br />

ufensis, Siberia, Karsten. Unknown to me and from description can not refer<br />

it to a section even.<br />

undulatus, United States, Schweinitz. No specimen known.<br />

ungulatus, Australia, Berkeley. Pileus sessile ungulate, broadly attached.<br />

Surface hard, smooth, dull, no distinct crust. Slightly adustus. Flesh white,<br />

hard. Pores medium, adustus (now). Spore? globose, 4-5 mic. Known only<br />

from the type at Kew. A single collection. The pores of the specimen grew in<br />

irregular areas of growth, starting at different levels and growing different lengths,,<br />

but I do not know but that is accidental in this specimen. The general nature<br />

and color of the pores are that of Polyporus fumosus and I have a feeling that it is.<br />

an aberrant form.<br />

unguliformis, Philippines, Murrill = Polyporus immaculatus, Murrill's name<br />

is the fifth that the plant has had.<br />

unicolor, United States, Schweinitz. The specimen in Schweinitz' herbarium<br />

is Polyporus obtusus, as has long been known, but the specimen does not agree<br />

with the description and it is far more probable that Schweinitz knew Polyporus<br />

obtusus as Sistotrema spongiosum changed by Fries to Polyporus labyrinthicus.<br />

venetus, Europe, Saccardo. Unknown. Something growing in a cave and<br />

no doubt an abnormality.<br />

verecundus, Cooke, Berkeley = Polyporus immaculatus of same author, that is,<br />

as to the probable type. All specimens are in Cooke's writing, hence this "type"<br />

is of doubtful authority.<br />

vermiculus, Europe, Veulliot. Seems from description to be Polyporus mollis.<br />

virginii-Cuboni, Brazil, McGinty. Change of armeniacus because the name<br />

was preoccupied. However, as the original turns out to be the common Polyporus<br />

amorphus, the occupation was only temporary, and the change was unnecessary.<br />

vulneratus, Java, Leveille = Polyporus bicolor.<br />

vulpinus, Europe, Fries = The poplar form of Polyporus rheades. For full account<br />

and history, see page 362.<br />

Weberianus, Samoa, Bresadola = Polyporus fruticum.<br />

Weinmanni, Europe, Fries = Polyporus mollis. There is a cotype at Kew.<br />

388

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!