06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONTEXT AND PORES COLORED.<br />

i^ijS,,jn part only; and an immaterial part, it seems to me, as the types described<br />

under this name are evidently Trametes cubensis. The type of Polyporus supinus is<br />

in t'he British Museum. It is so old and changed that we were never sure about it,<br />

although we examined it a number of times. At one time we called this species<br />

Polyporus subolivaceus, doubting it being supinus. Berkeley usually referred it to<br />

Polyporus plebius var. cubensis, and Thiessen lists it as Polyporus plebius. It has<br />

no relation to this species.<br />

A careful reading of Fries' Nov. Symb. leaves no doubt in our mind now as to<br />

the plant that Fries had, for we have puzzled long, as Fries evidently puzzled, over<br />

the conflicting colors that collections show. Cooke discovered that the plant was a<br />

Fomcs, and Morgan determined Fomes pomaceus as being Fomes supinus (sic).<br />

Murrill improved on Cooke's idea by calling it "Fomitella." Although faint indications<br />

of pore strata are sometimes seen, we are satisfied it is not a Fomes.<br />

SPECIMENS. Brazil, Anna Brockes, Rev. Rick (four collections), Rev. F. Thiessen, Gustave<br />

Peckolt. It is very common in Brazil, also abundant in Florida. We have many specimens from<br />

Florida.<br />

Compare cubensis (var.), guadalupensis, sordidissimus, also Fomes rudis, subfulvus.<br />

POLYPORUS VALENZUELIANUS. This is the same as Polyporus supinus<br />

as to peculiar, olive context and all characters, excepting that it has a reddish brown<br />

surface, not white. That it is other than a marked color form we do not believe,<br />

but it is biologically distinct, for we noted when growing that they did not intergrade<br />

much.<br />

It is much rarer in Florida than the type form. Montagne called it Polyporus<br />

valenzuelianus, which Berkeley referred to Polyporus supinus; and Fries suggests<br />

that Polyporus supinus was "discolored" specimens. We use the specific name<br />

as understood by Berkeley, Fries, and Montagne as to Montagne's original determination<br />

and the specimens he sent to Berkeley and Fries. But the specimen of Polyporus<br />

valenzuelianus listed by Montagne from Weddel, Brazil, is a different plant,<br />

with colored spores. The type in Montagne's herbarium from Cuba is not strongly<br />

spotted, but the specimens he sent Berkeley and Fries are, and we take it in this sense.<br />

Compare Fomes sordidus.<br />

POLYPORUS SUBOLIVACEUS. This has the same context color and is<br />

quite close to Polyporus supinus, and the old herbarium specimens can hardly be<br />

told apart. Fresh specimens, however, appear quite different. Polyporus subolivaceus<br />

is unicolorous, with a uniform pileus, surface, and context color, while in<br />

Polyporus supinus there is a strong contrast between the context and surface color.<br />

We have received from Brazil a specimen agreeing exactly with Berkeley's description<br />

and, no doubt, with his specimen when it was fresh. This species was named<br />

from Cuba, but must be quite rare there, as we noted no specimen in the abundant<br />

West Indies specimens at New York. Our note on Polyporus subolivaceus, Letter<br />

39, Note 26, and many of our previous determinations, we believe to be in error now<br />

SPECIMENS. But one collection, from Rev. J. Rick, Brazil.<br />

TRAMETES PROTEA. Pileus thin, y-\ cm., applanate, sessile, imbricate.<br />

Surface smooth, subolivaceus. Context dark olive (Dresden brown of Ridgway),<br />

hard, punky. Pores small, paler tissue than the context, decurrent behind. Spores<br />

not found, white without doubt.<br />

It is a question whether this is a Trametes or a Polyporus. Its relations are<br />

surely with the preceding plants. In fact, it is so close to Polyporus subolivaceus<br />

that the more punky context and larger pores are the only difference.<br />

SPECIMENS. South Africa, I. B. Pole Evans; Deutsch Ost Africa, H. L. Hammerstein;<br />

Samoa, C. G. <strong>Lloyd</strong>.<br />

344

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!