06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SPORES HYALINE. SETAE NONE.<br />

Variations. As previously stated, the "beech" form and the "birch" form<br />

are slightly different plants, but hardly entitled to separate names.<br />

FOMES NIGRESCEXS. This form of Fames fomentarius has a black,<br />

shiny, sulcate crust (cfr. Pol. Issue, page 16, fig. 210). This is probably the original<br />

form intended by Fries for his Fomes nigricans, but I think was confused in his<br />

latest work with the black form of Fomes igniarius. His specimens at Kew and<br />

Upsala at least are a form of Fomes igniarius. Fomes nigrescens is the plant that<br />

Klotzsch collected in Scotland and cited by Fries as Fomes nigricans. The specimen<br />

is in the exhibition case at Berlin.<br />

FOMES MARMORATUS. This is the most common Fomes we have in the<br />

American tropics. It is generally held to be a distinct species, but for me is the<br />

same as Fomes fomentarius in every essential. It usually differs in shape, being<br />

applanate instead of ungulate; sometimes it is quite thin. The pores are more<br />

minute. The context color is exactly the same in some specimens, in others a little<br />

lighter. The spores are hyaline, smooth, with granular contents 5-6 x 10-12 mic.<br />

as I measured them from fresh specimens recently in Florida. The crust is usually<br />

marked with black bands, but the same character in a less degree is often noted in<br />

Fomes fomentarius. I have specimens from Japan that can not be told from those<br />

of the American tropics.<br />

Fomes marmoratus has in recent years been called by me and by others Fomes<br />

fasciatus, under an impression that a type was at the British Museum. Investigation<br />

develops that this plant has no authentic history. A cotype in Thunberg's<br />

herbarium is stated to be quite different. (Cfr. Notes 33 and 131).<br />

Compare fasciatus, sclerodermeus, subfomentarius.<br />

FOMES ALBO-ATER At Kew is a collection from Brazil (Spruce 58)<br />

which appears to be a form of Fomes marmoratus. It has a smooth, black crust,<br />

but the new marginal growth is white, contrasting strongly, and the context color<br />

is much darker brown.<br />

Compare memorandus.<br />

FOMES CALIGINOSUS. Pileus thin, applanate (8-12 mm.<br />

thick), with a dark brown, or generally black, smooth, rugulose crust.<br />

Sometimes shiny, laccate. Context and pore tissue dark brown<br />

(Brussels brown). Pores minute with concolorous tissue and mouths.<br />

Setae, none. Spores usually abundant, subglobose, small, 3 mic.,<br />

subhyaline.<br />

This seems to be a frequent species in the East, Philippines, and<br />

Pacific Islands, but absent from American tropics. It is quite light<br />

in weight, and is not a typical Fomes, but rather has the appearance<br />

of being a lignescent Polyporus. The black crust is sometimes shiny,<br />

laccate, and then the first suggestion is a Ganodermus. Usually,<br />

however, it is dull.<br />

SPECIMEN. Ceylon, T. Fetch.<br />

Compare mortuosus, peguanus, roseo-albus, Cesatianus, Copelandi, endapalus.<br />

FOMES SUBFLEXIBILIS. Only known from the type at Kew, from<br />

Cuba, which is not very good and surely is not a Fomes. The context is brown,<br />

rather soft, and easily indented with the finger nail. Pores rigid, minute, concolorous,<br />

with concolorous mouths. Setae, none. Spores small, 3-3 $4, very pale color, almost<br />

i<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!