Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

subcinereus, British America, Berkeley = Polyporus adustus as acknowledged by
Berkeley. Specimens so labled are found in Fries' herbarium and at Paris.
suberis, Africa, Patouillard. Unknown to me.
suberosus, Europe, Linnaeus. An old supposed synonym for Polyporus betulinus
sometimes used as a juggle.
subgilvus, South America, Spegazzini = Polyporus gilvus sans "sub". Specimen
at Paris.
sublilacinus, Southern United States, Ellis. Based on a single specimen from
Langlois. It is same as the common Polyporus gilvus with slightly different textures,
tending towards Polyporus licnoides. It is a question if Polyporus licnoides
is other than a form of Polyporus gilvus and surely there is no room" for a "species"
between them that is based on a single specimen and "known only from the type
locality."
subluteus, Canada, Ellis. I have some cotype material of this but it has never
come out very distinctly as a species for me.
subpictilis, New Guinea, Hennings. Referred by Bresadola to Polyporus
bicolor. The type at Berlin is quite thin to be bicolor, nor is it spotted red as bicolor
typically is, still it has same color context and may be a thin form. I can not say
to the contrary.
subpruinatus, Java, Bresadola = Polyporus anebus, for me.
subrubidus, Philippines, Murrill = Polyporus bicolor.
subsericellus, Europe, Karsten. Unknown.
subsimulans, Cuba, Murrill. This was merely a name change of simulans
which Cooke alleged to come from Cuba, but probably came from Ceylon. Simulans
being a duplicate was changed by Murrill to subsimulans where he included this
Ceylonese (?) plant in his "North American" Flora. Had he called it Polyporus
fumosus it would not have been far from the truth.
subtropicalis, South America, Spegazzini = Polyporus licnoides, typical in
everything excepting a little thicker.
sulphuratus, Mexico, Fries = Polyporus rheicolor of this pamphlet, =also
Polyporus Splitgerberi and at Upsala where the two species can be compared they
are same thing. Why Fries renamed it I do not know as he had Montagne's specimen
to compare. The flesh is orange yellow rather than sulphur yellow.
sulphureo-pulverulentus, Siberia, Karsten. Nothing is known about it (fortunately).
surinamensis, South America, Miquel. No type known to me though at Paris
are specimens from Surinam so determined by Leveille, and may be cotypes. They
are the unzoned form of Polyporus zonalis called also by Leveille Polyporus rigidus.
Symphyton, United States, Schweinitz. No specimen preserved. The description
indicates that it was Polystictus biformis, a common American species,
not otherwise accounted for in Schweinitz' record.
tamaricis, Europe, Patouillard = Polyporus rheades growing on tamarix. This
tamarix form has only recently been recognized by me as being same as Polyporus
rheades. Bresadola figured it as Polyporus rheades, afterwards Patouillard thought
it was different and named it Polyporus tamaricis. Bresadola accepts this correction
and I have always thought it was correct until I began to compare the different
species with colored spores to find out the exact difference between them. Then
I could not find any as to Polyporus tamaricis and Polyporus rheades at least,
and I do not think there is any excepting the host.
terebrans, Cuba, Berkeley. Based on a single specimen same context and
color as Polyporus fumosus and I would prefer to so refer it with doubt than to
try to maintain a species on it.
testaceus, Europe, Fries. Pileus suberose, sordid testaceus, zonate within.
Pores minute, white. On Poplar. Unknown to me. Evidently close to alutaceus
and I suspect the frondose wood form of same thing.
at the British Museum.
Testudo, Australia, Berkeley = Polyporus durus. The type
texanus, Texas, Murrill. Based on young specimen of Polyporus corruscans
growing on mesquite. I have seen three collections, the type, and also from Long
and Yon Schrenk all on mesquite.
Thelephoroides, South America, Hooker = Polyporus conchoides, and an
earlier name for it, when those sacred principles of priority get into good working
order. No one has yet juggled it however.
387