06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

height from the ground, for the tree is always infected originally<br />

through some wound, like a broken branch. I have never noticed it<br />

on trunks in woods, but have collected it on trunks in park at Upsala<br />

and around Berlin, where the trunks are more liable to injuries. It is<br />

not often found on young trees, because the wounds on young, vigorous<br />

trees are more quickly protected by a coating of turpentine.<br />

In Europe, in addition to the Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris), which<br />

is its most common host, it occurs also on spruce, larch and the silver<br />

fir. In this country on various species of coniferous trees.<br />

There is a tradition handed down from Fries that the pores do<br />

not form distinct strata "sed nulla strata distincta," but that is a<br />

mistake. The strata are quite distinct and the plant is a Fomes.<br />

The young pores are lined with a yellowish hymenium which is noticeable<br />

to the eye. The old pores fill up with tissue the same color as<br />

the context, hence might be taken for the context. The young growing<br />

tissue is yellow, but it soon changes to brown, and rarely specimens<br />

are seen with any part yellow.<br />

Illustrations. Boudier, t. 161 is so perfect that it is not worth while citing others. Sturm.<br />

fasc. 17. t. 50 is very good, however, as to color. Patouillard, page 101, fig. 5, as Xanthocrous. which<br />

is supposed to mean "yellow spores," and not very applicable to a plant like this (or several that he<br />

includes) with hyaline spores.<br />

Specimens. Many from Europe and United States and Canada. None from foreign countries.<br />

Compare Fomes odoraius in Section 69, page 273.<br />

The following two plants we consider here from their evident close relationship<br />

to Fomes pini. They are classed as Trametes, which they are technically, I believe,<br />

for I do not know that they ever form layers of Still I think<br />

pores.<br />

they are better<br />

Fomes, from their woody texture and relationship, but I do not propose to change<br />

their names.<br />

Fig. 610.<br />

Trametes piceina.<br />

2 7 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!