06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e told. There are also cotype remnants at Paris. I judge the plant is concrescens<br />

or close.<br />

niveus, Java, Junghuhn. Type at Leidem is undeterminable, a white Poria,<br />

or more probably the resupinate part of some Polyporus.<br />

niveus, Saccardo, Vol. 6, p. 118 is a lapsus for Polyporus nidulans which is<br />

Polypotus rutilans.<br />

nivosellus, Cuba, Murrill = for me a thick specimen of Polyporus Calkinsii.<br />

Nonkahivensis, China, Patouillard. Based on two little frustules referred<br />

recently to Polyporus lingua but not in the sense of Montagne I think.<br />

Xotarisii, Europe, Berkeley, nomen nudum. Not "described" and no specimen<br />

found by me.<br />

obducens, British America, Berkeley. This is known from a single specimen<br />

in Hooker's herbarium from British America about eighty years ago. It is thin<br />

and reminds me of a piece of parchment paper. Recently it has been endorsed as<br />

a "prior name" for Polyporus osseus. It is quite doubtful to me, and I should<br />

not be disposed to disturb Polyporus osseus on such evidence. Fortunately, the<br />

endorsement was made after Murrill's visit to Kew, or he would without doubt have<br />

had a juggle for Polyporus osseus.<br />

oblinitus, Mauritius, Cooke = Polyporus bicolor. It is also = Polyporus sanguinarius<br />

and the same collection.<br />

obockensis, Africa, Patouillard = Polyporus colossus. As for many years the<br />

type of colossus in a jar at Upsala was unknown, the plant became fairly well known<br />

under Patouillard's name. We would be in favor of continuing it, but we are not<br />

partial to these latinized Ethiopian dialects.<br />

obvolutus, United States, Cooke = Polyporus volvatus.<br />

ochraceo-cinereus, Europe, Britzelmayr. So little can be told from Britzelmayr's<br />

work that it is hardly worth listing the name.<br />

omalopilus, Cuba, Montagne (changed by Saccardo to homalopilus). It is<br />

Polyporus gilvus.<br />

oroleucus, Java, Patouillard = Polyporus tropicus from same locality.<br />

ostreatus, Brazil, Leveille = Trametes cubensis. Type at Paris.<br />

pachycheiles, United States, Ellis. Probably equals cerifluus or crispellus.<br />

These thin white species with reddish tendency are not all clear. It is not, however,<br />

semisupinus as stated, which has no reddish tendency.<br />

pachylus, British America, Cooke. A remnant, probably resupinate part of<br />

Polystictus biformis.<br />

pachyotis, South America, Spegazzini. Only known to me from Rev. Rick's<br />

determinations which are same for me as Polyporus Chaffangeoni.<br />

pallescens, Europe, Fries = Polyporus fumosus it is thought. Specimens I<br />

have received from correspondents under this name are Polyporus fumosus.<br />

pallido-cervinus, United States, Schweinitz. The little frustule in Schweinitz's<br />

herbarium is Polyporus rutilans. In the sense of Morgan it was Trametes malicola,<br />

and in the sense of Berkeley (from Cuba) it was Polystictus biformis.<br />

pallido-micans, Europe, Britzelmayr. Another name only.<br />

Palmarum, Cuba, Murrill = Polyporus Calkinsii.<br />

paluster, United States, Berkeley. The type is a small specimen in very poor<br />

condition and its identity not sure but I think it is Polyporus albellus which,<br />

however, has no right to grow on pine. It has a thin but distinct crust. In sense<br />

of Murrill Polyporus paluster is Polyporus albidus a plant with quite a different<br />

surface.<br />

paradoxus, Europe, Fries. No specimen known. The description appears to<br />

me same as Polyporus Soloniensis (cfr. Letter 42) which I am disposed to think<br />

is a lapsus of Polyporus sulphureus.<br />

parvulus, Central America, Murrill. Based on two small specimens in Ellis'<br />

herbarium which I would refer to subsessile Polyporus lucidus as Ellis did.<br />

pelleporus, Europe, Sowerby t. 230 = Polyporus fumosus.<br />

pellitus, Europe, Karsten. Unknown. Reads like Polyporus osseus.<br />

perplexus, United States, Peck. No specimen exists. Nothing known about<br />

it excepting Peck thought at the time he named it, that it was different from the<br />

common Polyporus cuticularis which he well knew at the time. Murrill who never<br />

saw it, takes it as the name for Polyporus cuticularis which is rather far fetched<br />

under these circumstances.<br />

383

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!