06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

hinocephalus, Tasmania, Berkeley. Type all known appears to be Polyporus<br />

fumosus.<br />

rhodophaeus, Java, Leveille. It was misdescribed by Leveille and not recognized<br />

by Bresadola when he worked over the Leveille specimens. I hunted<br />

up the type from Junghuhn's labeling "Rosa mala" and found that it had been<br />

endorsed Polyporus semilaccatus.<br />

ribicola, Europe, Karsten. Little frustules are at Berlin. I did not recognize<br />

them as anything I knew. It seems to be a Polyporus with colored context. I do<br />

not believe it is a form of rutilans however, as somebody states.<br />

Brazil, Patouillard, see page 357.<br />

roseo-fuscus, Brazil, Romell =Trametes cupreo-roseus.<br />

PRickii, roseo-maculatus, Europe, Karsten. Unknown to me but from description<br />

it is the flesh colored-pore form of Polyporus amorphus.<br />

rubiginosus, Europe, Schrader. This old vague record has been variously<br />

interpreted. Fries (late date) as a synonym for Polyporus fuscus of this pamphlet.<br />

. Fries (at an early date) as Polyporus fissilis of this pamphlet. Fries' specimen at<br />

Kew is Polyporus cuticularis. Bresadola Fungus Kmet. as Fomes applanatus,<br />

which is correct. The "farina<br />

probably rubiginosa" of the pileus is no doubt the<br />

spore deposit that often mysteriously covers the top of the pileus of Fomes applanatus.<br />

rubiginosus, Tasmania, Berkeley. This was changed by Berkeley to Polyporus<br />

Lawrencii. It is Polyporus gilvus.<br />

rufo-albus, Africa, Bresadola (as Ptychogaster). Type is at Berlin. I think<br />

it is a normal Ganodermus close to Oerstedii. Spores are both truncate (normal)<br />

and globose (conidial) but I think the presence of conidial spores does not make<br />

it a Ptychogaster.<br />

rufo'-pictus, "Cuba" Cooke. This was one of Berkeley's left-overs, (probably<br />

I judge from the writing on the label from Ceylon) which Cooke dug up and published.<br />

It is Polyporus zonalis. Berkeley referred many specimens to Polyporus zonalis,<br />

and why he did not recognize this I can not say. Probably he did (as he did not<br />

publish it) but forgot to change his label.<br />

rugulosus, Java, Leveille. No type found by me at Leiden and none exists<br />

at Paris. It is considered same as Polyporus zonalis. Specimens I have noted<br />

so named are mostly Polyporus rigidus, the unzoned form of Polyporus zonalis.<br />

Saccardoi, Europe, Cooke. Change of Polyporus sericellus (bis) which being<br />

Polyporus rufescens was not worth changing.<br />

sanguinarius, Mauritius, Klotzsch = Polyporus bicolor. The type is at Upsala.<br />

At Kew the cotype simply "No. 13" by Klotzsch was endorsed by Berkeley "oblinitus.<br />

I have not ventured to publish it." Cooke not only ventured to publish it, but put<br />

it in Fomes (sic). The pileus has a dark red stain but nothing to suggest "blood"<br />

and Junghuhn's name bicolor is much better for it. It must not be confused with<br />

Daedalea sanguinea of the same author, which is Trametes Persqonii of the tropics.<br />

Berkeley usually employed Trametes sanguinea as the name for the latter plant.<br />

We use the name on page 338 in a very close but not exactly same sense as Klotzsch,<br />

in order to avoid inventing a new name.<br />

Sarrazini, Europe, Schulzer. Judging from the figure of Lucand (No. 99 as<br />

vulpinus) which Schulzer states to represent his "species" the plant is probably<br />

Polystictus pubescens or velutinus.<br />

Satpoorensis, India, De Beck. The illustration excellent<br />

is^an<br />

picture of<br />

Polystictus leoninus. Those who discover "new species" of such common things<br />

ought not to give good pictures of them. The safest way is to "describe" them<br />

and then chuck the specimen in the waste basket.<br />

scanicus, Europe, Fries = Polyporus adustus. Type at Kew.<br />

Schulzeri, Europe, Fries. Change by Fries of Polyporus Irpex which is a<br />

privilege that our learned law makers only allow to Mr. Fries. Any one else it is<br />

illegal. No specimens known to Fries but the drawing is still in his collections.<br />

The plant is probably same as Polyporus obtusus.<br />

scrobiculatus, Europe, Karsten. Description reads like radiatus. Spores<br />

read like cuticularis. Unknown what it was.<br />

semidigitaliformis, Australia, Berkeley. Type too poor to comment.<br />

semipileatus, United States, Peck = Polyporus semisupinus of this pamphlet.<br />

sensibilis, N. W. United States, Murrill = Polyporus fragilis.<br />

385

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!