06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is entitled to a name, for if is a biological entity, whether it is considered as a variety or<br />

as a species.<br />

NOTE 170. Thelephora (Sp.), sent by O. M. Oleson, from Santa Barbara, Cal. This<br />

might be reierred to Thelephora Caryophyllea, a lacerated form, but I cannot believe it.<br />

I have many specimens of Thelephora. Caryophyllea in sense of Burt, labeled Thelephora<br />

radiata. I do not question that the original figure of Caryophyllea (Schaeffer. t. 325) is<br />

the same as the Holmsk figure of Thelephora radiata. It will be tound that Fries did<br />

not take them as the same, and as law abiding citizens we are supposed to follow Fries.<br />

Fries distinguishes Caryophyllea from radiata, the former having even hymenium, the<br />

latter striate hymenium. Notwithstanding that Fries ascribes an "even" hymenium to Thelephora<br />

Caryophyllea, the original figure shows plainly a strongly striate hymenium as has<br />

the usual specimen so referred. We therefore accept the name Thelephora radiata for this<br />

species with a striate hymenium, as the name was based on this character. Persoon, as<br />

shown by a specimen in his herbarium, interpreted fcchaeffer's figure and name as being<br />

what is now called Thelephora terrestris, a species with papillate hymenium. In fact, I<br />

believe that Persoon, Fries, and Burt each indicate a different plant under the name<br />

"Thelephora Caryophyllea, Schaeffer," and for that reason alone the name Thelephora radiata<br />

seems far better to me. I think Burt is the only one of the three that has Thelephora<br />

Caryophyllea right in its original meaning, but Burt indicates that he intends to follow the<br />

law formulated by Messrs. Atkinson and Maire, and it is directly against this "law" to<br />

correct Fries' mistakes.<br />

But all this has but little to do with the plant Mr. Oleson sends, which for me is not<br />

a form of Thelephora radiata.<br />

NOTE 171. Stereum variicolor, as a form of Stereum hirsutum. This species, received<br />

from Mr. C. E. Owens, Corvallis, Oregon, differs from the Eastern and European form of<br />

Stereum hirsutum in having narrow, brown, glabrous bands on the pileus, similar in appearance<br />

and color to those often noted on Polystictus versicolor. I have gone over my<br />

specimens of this species from Europe and foreign countries, and do not find the sam?<br />

features in any collection excepting one from South Africa. It is a very distinct form of<br />

Stereum hirsutum. Similar colorations and glabrous bands are found on our common<br />

Stereum fasciatum, but otherwise the species is so different it cannot be confused.<br />

NOTE 172. Stereum bicolor, from Mr. C. E. Owens, Corvallis, Oregon. At first sight<br />

this seems so different that I am inclined to name_ it as "var. album." The top of the dry<br />

pileus is not brown as our Eastern plant always is, but white, otherwise it is the same in<br />

all particulars. When I wet the specimens, however, they become brown, hence it would<br />

be difficult to maintain it even as a variety.<br />

NOTE 173. Daedalea umbrina, as var. of Daedalea quercina received from Gustavo<br />

Peckolt, Brazil. As to texture and configuration, this is exactly the same as Daedalea<br />

quercina of temperate regions. It differs only in the much darker context color. Daedalea<br />

umbrina has context dark umber (raw umber of Ridgway), while Daedalea quercina<br />

has context that approaches pinkish cinnamon of Ridgway. In this same series Daedalea<br />

glabrescens of the East has uncolored context. All these are forms of one species for me.<br />

NOTE 174. Polyporus squamosus, sent by J. Simmonds, Brisbane, Australia, differs<br />

from the European form in having smaller, innate scales, and stem is not black.<br />

NOTE 175. Fomes ochroflavus, as Trametes from Rev. C. Torrend, Bahia, Brazil. The<br />

plant is very close to Fomes geotropus, and has been confused with it. The surface, context,<br />

context color, and general size and appearance are the same. The difference is in the<br />

pores, concolorous with the context in ochroflavus, distinct color from the context in Fomes<br />

geotropus. Fomes ochroflavus was named as a Trametes, but Rev. Torrend's specimen has<br />

distinct pore layers and is typically a Fomes.<br />

NOTE 176. Hydnochaete badium, from Re%-. C. Torrend, Bahia, Brazil. The "genus"<br />

Hydnochaete is intermediate between Poria such as Poria contigua, and Irpex such as<br />

Irpex cinnamomeus. This specimen is really nearer Poria than the Hydnaceous group.<br />

NOTE 177. Stereum Leveilleanum, received from Rev. C. Torrend, Bahia, Brazil.<br />

This is found also at Paris, from Brazil, as Thelephora amoena, but the type was from<br />

Chile and is not in evidence. It is also Stereum roseocarneum. Fries. Nov. Symb., p. 96.<br />

attributed to Schweinitz, but he referred this to Stereum anthocroa in his second work, and<br />

it is probably not this plant.<br />

NOTE 178. Fomes squarrosus, received from Rev. James Wilson, Victoria, Australia.<br />

Pileus ungulate with a black, rough crust. Context hard, dark-brown (antique brown).<br />

Pores minute, round, with concolorous mouths. Pore layers indistinct. Setae few, slender.<br />

Spores hyaline, globose, 4 mic. By the eye this Fomes could not be distinguished from<br />

Fomes rimosus, but the microscopic characters are entirely different. Mr. Wilson sent a<br />

fine photograph of the plant, which will be used in illustrating the species in a synopsis<br />

of the genus Fomes, now in preparation. The species is related to Fomes torrulosus and<br />

Fomes Cinchonensis.<br />

NOTE 179. Polyporus Wilsonianus, from Rev. James Wilson, Victoria, Australia.<br />

This form is a form of Polyporus sulphureus, differing in very thin flesh 1-2 mm. thick, and<br />

spores piriform instead of globose. It is only known to me from Australia. I have never<br />

noted a similar form in the abundant specimens we have from Europe and America.<br />

NOTE 180. Polyporus Eucalyptorum. From Rev. James Wilson, Victoria, Australia.<br />

This is a frequent species. Known only from Australia and New Caledonia. It was well<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!