06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

acerinus, Europe, Opiz. Nomen nudum.<br />

acriculus, Europe, Karsten. Seems from description to be same as albellus.<br />

Adansonii, Africa, Patouillard. = at least it is so supposed, a curious conidial<br />

state of Polyporus colossus.<br />

adiposus, England, Berkeley = Polyporus undatus probably.<br />

aethiops, India. Cooke. Type something dead and discolored (black). Not<br />

a species.<br />

affinis, Europe, Boudier = Polyporus resinaceus.<br />

Afzelii, Africa, Fries. No type exists. Trametes roseola at Paris is endorsed<br />

as being this plant but I doubt it. Fries states expressly that the context is not<br />

"elasticus" and describes it as "albido" and compares it to Polyporus betulinus.<br />

albo-aurantius, Europe, Veuilliot distribution Roumeguere 2403 is Polyporus<br />

amorphus.<br />

albo-gilvus, Cuba, Berkeley = Polyporus flavescens. It is a rare plant, only one<br />

collection from Brazil at Paris and one at Kew from Cuba.<br />

albo-incarnata, South America, Patouillard. Unknown to me but described<br />

as a Poria. Burt's determination Baker 2483 Nicaragua, is Trametes cubenesis<br />

with no possible resemblance to description.<br />

albo-roseus, Europe, Karsten. Unknown to me. From description and<br />

knowledge of plants of that region I have no doubt it was Polyporus amorphus.<br />

albo-sordescens, Europe. Romell Polyporus fissilis.<br />

albostygius, Cuba. Berkeley. As long as it is "only known from the type<br />

locality" it is a Poria, at least the type (all known) a piece (now) \y2 x 2 cm. is<br />

entirely resupinate. It is something unique though, Subiculum thin. Pores<br />

minute, 4 mm. long, pale, probably white when fresh, with black pore mouths.<br />

Spores not found by me.<br />

albus, England, Hudson. The original description of Hudson refers probably<br />

to Polyporus salignus. Fries' account was apparently made up from pictures,<br />

Bull, 433 f. 1 and Price f. 78, neither of which represents plants known to me. Bresadola<br />

in Fung. Kmet. refers to Polyporus fissilis of this pamphlet. Although Polyporus<br />

albus was originally from England, I have not found it in Berkeley's writings<br />

although Price claims to have named his specimens from Berkeley's Outlines. Nor<br />

does it occur in any of the modern English compilations.<br />

altocedronensis, Cuba. Murrill = Polyporus leucospongius for me on comparison.<br />

amplectus, Florida, Murrill Polyporus fruticum. Originally from Cuba, when<br />

it crosses to Jamaica it becomes Polyporus corrosus and when it occurs in Florida<br />

it becomes Polyporus amplectus. All by the same author. It is rare in Florida.<br />

Two collections are at New York and one in our museum.<br />

anceps, United States, Peck. This is only known from the original collection<br />

made by Prof. Burt in Massachusetts on Hemlock and named by Peck. I found<br />

no type at Albany, but in the New York Botanical Gardens are specimens from<br />

Burt. It is a white plant, with hard context, minute pores and spores said to be<br />

"globose". Except as to "globose" spores, as to which I can not say, it is as to<br />

host and other characters, very much same as Polyporus albidus of Europe.<br />

angustus, Australia, Berkeley. Only known from the type, a single specimen,<br />

a resupinate piece of Polyporus tephronotus.<br />

apalus, Europe, Leveille. No type found and almost passed out of European<br />

tradition excepting locally in France, where the specimens are Polyporus fumosus.<br />

armeniacus, Scotland, Berkeley. Based on subresupinate specimens of Polyporus<br />

amorphus.<br />

ascoboloides, Australia, Berkeley. Type destroyed.<br />

atrostrigosus, New Zealand, Cooke. Seems from the scanty material to have<br />

white flesh and pores and black appressed fibrillose surface. It will probably be<br />

recognized some day on I comparison. do not know it well enough to refer it to<br />

a section, but probably it will go in Section 82. Polyporus setiger from New Zealand<br />

in Section 82 is probably the same plant.<br />

aureonitens, United States, Peck = a young condition of Polyporus radiatus.<br />

badius, Java, Junghuhn = Polyporus vinosus. It does not seem to have been<br />

included in Saccardo. It was not published by Junghuhn and the color term (badius)<br />

has little application to it.<br />

Balansae, South America, Spegazzini. = Polyporus licnoides, cotypes at Paris.<br />

Cotypes at Kew are rather Polyporus gilvus.<br />

375

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!