06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cervmus, United States, Schweinitz. No specimen in Schweinitz' herbarium<br />

but a little specimen at Upsala which was, after many years, taken by Bresadola in<br />

the sense of Polystictus biformis. I doubt it (cfr Letter 50) and the name is a<br />

duplicate at any rate, being a Persoonian species.<br />

chromoflavus, West Indies, Patouillard (published?) = Polyporus Oersterii<br />

Species at Berlin.<br />

chrysites, Brazil, Berkeley = Polyporus capucinus. The specimens are bright<br />

color but hardly "golden yellow". They are the thin form, corresponding to the<br />

types of capucinus in this respect, but for me a thin form of fruticum.<br />

ciliatulus, Europe, Kars'ten. Very few of his species have ever been recognized<br />

by anyone else.<br />

cinctus, England, Berkeley. Teste Bresadola = Polyporus undatus. The types<br />

have abundant mycelial growths a kind of "ozonium". There is no account of this<br />

growth however, in any of the various other names applied to Polyporus undatus,<br />

nor have we ever seen it in connection with this species.<br />

cineratus, Europe, Karsten. Unknown. Said to have white spores. Reads<br />

like Polyporus fumosus but grew on Abies. It is curious how many marvelous "new<br />

species" Karsten and Quelet found that no one else in Europe ever meets.<br />

cinereo-fuscus, India, Curry = Polyporus semilaccatus discolored.<br />

citromallus, Cuba, Berkeley. A manuscript name attached to a little frustule<br />

at Kew. Cooke must have overlooked it when he was "describing" Berkeley's<br />

remnants.<br />

comptulus, South America, Berkeley. Only known from very old types in<br />

Hooker's herbarium. I believe it to be Trametes cubensis though by no means<br />

sure. It is safe to say it will never be recognized with certainty.<br />

Corium, India, Berkeley. Only known from the type and I doubt if it will<br />

ever be well known from that. It is white and has a soft flesh. I would not try to<br />

give any idea of its characters from such a specimen.<br />

connexus, Brazil, Leveille. Type (all known) is doubtfully Polyporus rigidus.<br />

It has been referred to Polyporus licnoides but surely in error as it has no setae.<br />

contractus, Celyon, Berkeley = the resupinate portion of Polyporus lignosus.<br />

It always "contracts" in drying.<br />

corrosus, West Indies, Murrill = Polyporus fruticum. The author got this<br />

plant from Florida, Jamaica and Philippines. The first he called Polyporus amplectus,<br />

the second Polyporus corrosus, and the Philippine specimen Polyporus<br />

fruticum.<br />

corruscans, Europe, Fries. This is the oak form of Polyporus rheades which<br />

see (page 362) for detailed history.<br />

crocatus, United States (?) Klotzsch = Polyporus scruposus teste Fries. I<br />

have never located any specimen.<br />

crocicolor, mss. at Kew (from Ellis) = Polyporus aurantiacus.<br />

cubensis, Cuba, Berkeley (as var. of plebius) = Polyporus supinus, and this is<br />

the name under which Berkeley usually referred it. It has no relation to the plant<br />

from New Zealand in Berkeley's herbarium as Polyporus plebius. Nothing very<br />

similar to Polyporus supinus grows in the East, nor similar to Trametes plebia in<br />

American tropics.<br />

cucullatus, United States, Berkeley. This is known only from the type locality,<br />

a couple of little frustules each about size of peas. It has been referred to Polyporus<br />

radiatus. I think that is right, or more probably little "nodules" of nodulosus.<br />

cupreus, India, Berkeley = Polyporus carneo-fulvus.<br />

cupreo-vinosus, Brazil, Cooke = Trametes cupreo-roseus and same collection.<br />

As Cooke states, it originated in an error in writing the label.<br />

Curreyanus, New Zealand, Berkeley. The type, a very poor specimen, I think<br />

is adustus. It is endorsed now as being old dichrous. It is no species at any rate.<br />

decipiens, United States, Schweinitz. Unknown. No specimens preserved.<br />

There is a small specimen at Kew (authentic?) which is Polystictus vcrsicolor.<br />

Delavayi, China, Patouillard. Unknown to me. From description may be<br />

same as recently named versiporus.<br />

demissus, Australia, Berkeley. Types all known appear to be Polyporus fumosus.<br />

Cooke's determination is Polyporus adustus.<br />

digitalis, India, Berkeley. Types all known are very poor. Looks much like<br />

Polyporus adustus.<br />

377

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!