06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SPORES COLORED. SETAE NONE.<br />

FOMES BADIUS is quite close to Fomes rimosus, and distinguished with<br />

difficulty. It has the same general appearance, shape, surface, context color, but<br />

on comparison the surface is smoother, the pores are a little larger and also the<br />

spores, which measure 6-7 mic. The pore mouths are darker and soft to the touch.<br />

It seems to be quite a common form in several countries. It does not figure much<br />

in literature, for it is usually referred to Fomes rimosus. The type is at Kew.<br />

Klotzsch labeled it as coming from British America, but it was certainly from the<br />

tropics, where it is a common species. It is also the same as Fomes rimosus as to<br />

the Mauritius specimens, and Fomes Pappianus of my recent determination. It is<br />

much too close to (typical) Fomes rimosus for comfort.<br />

SPECIMENS. India, Karachi, D. F. O. Jerruck. Very abundant collections and surely the<br />

most common Fomes in that locality.<br />

Uruguay, Dr. F. Felippone.<br />

Compare Pappianus, Underwoodii.<br />

FOMES SCABER (Fig. 591). Pileus unguliform, with a rough, light brown,<br />

uneven surface. Context brittle, soft, light brown (Buckthorn brown). Pores<br />

medium, irregular, long, reaching the crust. Setae, none. Spores in great abundance,<br />

pale colored, 4-6.<br />

This is known only from an old type (Tasmania) at Kew, and a recent specimen<br />

received by me from Rev. James Wilson, Australia. We believe our specimen is the<br />

same on comparison with type, though color of crust and context is lighter, perhaps<br />

due to old age of the type. The spores too of the type are more globose and of deeper<br />

color. In very ancient history this was determined as igniarius var. scaber, by<br />

Berkeley, from Tasmania. Then he confused it with another species from Mauritius<br />

some years later and called both Fomes rimosus. No additional specimen of the<br />

249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!