Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Misnamed,
dealbatus, Polyporus.
Rav. No. 10 = Polyporus mutabilis (misdetermination).
(Cfr. Stipitate Polyporoids, page 190.)
Misnamed,
destruens, Merulius.
Desm. 125, 668 = Merulius lacrymans (synonym).
(Correct?)
destructor, Polyporus. Rab. 2302 Sydow, 403.
I cannot say the contrary, as I do not know the species. Raben-
horst states: "This species is in no ways as 'gemein' as many mycologists
appear to think. The characters are zonate within, pores elongated, dentate,
lacerate."
dichrons, Polyporus. Karsten, 237 de Thiim. TOT.
"Fries in litt."
Compare conchoides.
Misnamed.
Drummondii, Polystictus.
Balansa, 1403 = Polystictus versatilis (misdetermination). (Changed to Polystictus
Spegazzini in Saccardo, which hence becomes a synonym for Polystictus versatilis.
dryadeus, Polyporus. de Thiim. 4, T12.
Misnamed,
dubius, Polyporus.
"Fries in litt." Mss. name only. It appears to be plant called "lacteus" now.
ectypus, Polystictus. X. A. F. 2011 Rav. 716.
elegans, Polyporus. Fuck. 1395 (Pores larger than normal)
X. A. F. 2303.
"Fries in litt.'' as Polyporus nummnlarius, which Fries only
held to be a small form of Polyporus elegans.
Misnamed,
elegans, Trametes.
Balansa, 121, Tonkin = Lcnzites repanda (synonym).
Misnamed.
Ellisianus, Polyporus.
Baker, 55 = Fomes fraxinophilus (synonym).
Misnamed,
endocrocinus, Polyporus.
N. A. F. 2508, afterwards amended to Polyporus Pilotae, which is a synonym for
Polyporus croceus.
Misnamed,
epileucus, Polyporus.
de Thiim. 1110. I suspect this is Polyporus salignus, as illustrated by Bulliard, but
it is not the ideal form of Polyporus salignus. I do not know the specimen for certain,
but it is not Polyporus epileucus, as known to me from the "type locality" Femsjo, Sweden.
"Fries in litt." If this specimen attributed to "Fries in litt." is correct, then my
conclusions as to Polyporus epileucus are incorrect. These are surely Polyporus pubescens
in sense of Fries' writings.
Europaeus, Favolus. Fung. Col. 1111 X. A. F. 604 Sacc. 28.
10