06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pores are completely filled with white hyphae, but I doubt if that is a normal<br />

feature of the plant. Setae, none. Spores globose, colored, 5 mic. While the interposed<br />

layers of context are unusual among Fomes, species based on this feature in<br />

Europe (Fomes vegetus) are known to be abnormal conditions, and that may be<br />

the case in this instance. On the other hand, Fomes connatus is always so characterized.<br />

griphaeformis, Australia, Berkeley. No type exists.<br />

Haematoxyli, Jamaica, Murrill. Based on one collection which, except as to<br />

shape (more applanate), is quite close to Fomes igniarius and probably a form.<br />

The context is dark brown. The "honey-yellow-context" of the description was a<br />

careless observation of some yellow, mycelial growth that had overrun the surface<br />

of some of the old tissue.<br />

halconensis, Philippines, Bresadola (as variety of spadiceus). Unknown to<br />

me. It seems quite large to be referred as a variety of spadiceus.<br />

Hasskarlii, Java, Leveille. The type cited at Leiden is the same as senex of<br />

this pamphlet. Cotype at Kew is Fomes pectinatus. Owing to the confusion, we<br />

prefer to use Montagne's previous name, Fomes senex, although that was also<br />

badly confused by Montagne. We have heretofore used the name Hasskarlii (cfr.<br />

Letter 38).<br />

helveolus, Europe, Rostkovius. The figure seems to be Fomes pinicola, but the<br />

description does not at all accord. Fries so referred a plant collected by Lindblad,<br />

which Romell thinks must have been Fomes pinicola. Rostkovius described helveolus<br />

as being "fleshy," but no similar fleshy plant is now known in Europe.<br />

hippopus, Incog, Bresadola, = Fomes hornodermus. This is based on an old<br />

specimen in Willdenow's herbarium, labeled "Boletus Hippopus," but not published<br />

until 1890. Spores teste author 5x8-9. In Saccardo (9. 174) it is in error<br />

ascribed to Europe. It corresponds to the common plant in Africa, which was<br />

probably its source. The African form has a smoother, more even surface than the<br />

American, and might be maintained as a form.<br />

Hohnelii, Java, Bresadola. Unknown to me. Compared to Fomes zelandicus,<br />

with setae and colored spores, 5x6.<br />

holomelanus, Brazil, Cooke, = Fomes atro-umbrinus. Berkeley labeled two<br />

lots, one atro-umbrinus (which he published), the other holomelanus, which Cooke<br />

dug up and published. They are exactly the same thing, same collector, and probably<br />

same collection, v. Hohnel has an interesting notation on the type of holomelanus<br />

that it is a Ganodermus (sic).<br />

hyperboreus, Canada, Berkeley. No type exists. Guessed by Murrill to<br />

have been possibly Fomes igniarius, which appears to have been a bad guess if its<br />

context was "pale cervine," as described.<br />

hypopolius, Australia, Kalchbrenner (as Polyporus). No specimen in museum,<br />

but description indicates Fomes annosus.<br />

ignarioides, Mexico, Patouillard, = for me young Fomes rimosus, same context<br />

color, spores and absence of setae. The surface is not rimose, but the specimen is<br />

young. If this is not Fomes rimosus it is surely Fomes endotheius, which is too<br />

close to Fomes rimosus. The context color (whence the name) is not that of Fomes<br />

igniarius, but Fomes robustus, the latter being misknown as Fomes igniarius locally<br />

in France.<br />

inaequalis, Finland, Karsten (as Trametes). Specimen at Upsala appears to<br />

me to be young nodules of Fomes igniarius (malvenu).<br />

incanus, Europe, Quelet. Quelet claims that Fomes ulmarius, fraxineus, and<br />

cytisinus were all the same species for which he invented a new name, Fomes incanus.<br />

If it were true, which it is not, there would be no occasion for a new name.<br />

incrassatus, Australia, Berkeley, = Fomes leucophaeus.<br />

introstuppeus, Perak, Cooke, = Fomes fomentarius.<br />

Inzengae, Italy, De Notaris. This is the common Fomes fomentarius. Several<br />

exsiccatae specimens are found in the museums.<br />

irregularis, United States, Underwood (as Polyporus), = Teste Murrill, subresupinate<br />

Fomes annosus. I never took the trouble to look it up. If Underwood<br />

did not know the common Fomes annosus, he was particularly competent to announce<br />

"new species."<br />

Kamphoveneri, Tahiti, Fries, = Fomes lignosus. Type at Upsala. At one<br />

time this was the name used by Bresadola, though he has since accepted my cor-<br />

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!