Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

fucatus, Europe, Quelet = Polyporus gilvus. There is a little cotype at Upsala.
It is a remarkably rare plant in Europe (cfr. Letter 38, Note 22). It has no relation
to lucidus as classed by Quelet, does not have "colored spores", has little resemblance
to his figure and may not be his plant excepting as to the specimen he sent Fries. I
am told by Bresadola, however, that he has Polyporus gilvus from Quelet.
fumidiceps, United States, Atkinson. Unknown to me. (Cfr. page 389.)
fusco-badia, Philippines, Bresadola (mss.) as Trametes = Polyporus Patouillardii
of Brazil. I have exactly same plant from Japan, G. Yamada. I do not
know that Trametes fusco-badia was ever published, though specimen sent to me
was marked "cotype".
fusco-cinereus, South America, Patouillard. Unknown to me. Compared
to Polyporus adustus.
fuscolutescens, Europe, Fuckel = nodulosus it is stated.
fusco-pellis, Europe, Quelet = Polyporus quercinus teste Bresadola.
fusco-velutinus, United States, Patouillard = Polyporus cuticularis.
Garckeanus, India, Hennings = Polyporus nilgherriensis which is not much of an
improvement as far as the name goes.
gogolensis, New Guinea, Hennings = Polyporus immaculatus, Henning's
barbarous name, which he borrowed apparently from the native dialect, fortunately
does not have to be used.
Gordoni, England, Berkeley, nomen nudum and type a remmant. Probably
Polyporus brumalis.
gossypinus, Europe, Leveille. The type a little frustule from Mougeat, too
poor for comment, is at Paris. Except the discoverer I believe no one had ever
found it, but Berkeley found something that he called it on gorse, hence it is carried
in the English text books. I know no species in Europe with "white cottony pileus"
and believe it to be principally imagination.
gratus, India, Berkeley. Based on one collection which is white, thin, with
allantoid spores and seems same as Polyporus floriformis of this pamphlet.
griseus, Java, Bresadola. Seems to me on comparison to be same as Polyporus
ostreiformis. Griseus would be a better name for it, if it were not preoccupied.
guadalupensis, West Indies, Leveille. Only known from the type at Paris and
I think will prove in time a good species. It is quite close to Polyporus anebus
which I believe does not occur in the American tropics. It has same shape, general
appearance, etc., but the context is more brown, surface smoother, pore mouths
darker. It must be rare for I did not note it in the abundant West Indian material
at New York. Murrill refers it to Polyporus supinus, an obvious mistake. Compare
micromegas.
guaitecasensis, Chile, Hennings. It has been recently referred to Berkeley!
I believe, and when I examined the type some years ago I noted that it had same
flesh, pores and spores as Berkeley!. As it was described as "dimidiate" and grew
"in truncis putridis" I could not see how it could be Berkeley!, however, unless the
name is a mistake or unless the South American plant has a different habit from the
North American plant, for it never grows on "trunks" in the United States. The
type I saw was only fragments and nothing could be told as to how it grew, but
"eine gross exampler" was stated to be in the museum which I did not find.
guttulatus, United States, Peck, change of maculatus and = alutaceus of Europe.
haematinus, India, Berk, nomen nudum and name even not found at Kew.
Halesiae, United States, Berkeley = Polyporus adustus.
Hausmanni, Europe, Fries. It is supposed to be same as hispidus. No type
exists in Fries' herbarium, (it came from Tyrol). It seems from description to be
hispidus excepting that Polyporus hispidus is not "pale within".
havannensis, Cuba, Berkeley. Pileus (2 x 4 x % cm.) with smooth reddish
brown surface (Hazel). Context thin. Pores small dark, isabelline color. Known
only from type at Kew, a single partial specimen. Determinations at New York
are thick specimens of Polyporus subfulvus belonging to the section Petaloides,
and no connection with this. The plant could be recognized I believe, on comparison
with type. It will probably go in Section 95. I believe that Polyporus
valenzuelianus of Montagne's determinations from Waddell, Brazil, (not type)
to be this plant.
Helix, United States, Hennings as var. of volvatus. It is the usual thing.
hemileucus, Cuba, Berkeley. When described six specimens are cited which
are referable to three different sp'ecies, viz., Trametes cubensis, Polyporus modestus,
379